-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ingest: Start separating Metadata from IngestSourceAndMetadata #88401
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf2085f
WIP
stu-elastic e0ff58a
Split Metadata off off IngestSourceAndMetadata
stu-elastic 4ea1791
Update metadata javadoc
stu-elastic 7244010
Add hashcode and equals to make the WritableIngestDocumentTests pass
stu-elastic 76022a6
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:elastic/elasticsearch into ingest…
stu-elastic 75f85bd
keys() -> getKeys(), don't cache entrySet, check metadata in source, …
stu-elastic aebad9a
Return raw map
stu-elastic 0c2e023
Better javadoc for metadata
stu-elastic 267ebde
Merge branch 'master' of github.com:stu-elastic/elasticsearch into in…
stu-elastic bdf6bfd
Check metadata map in testSimulate
stu-elastic 1600725
keySet(), Sets.intersection, isAvailable, protected validator & getters
stu-elastic dd8b711
Avoid ConcurrentModificationException by copying keySet for EntrySet
stu-elastic 3cfdbbb
IllegalArgumentException -> IllegalStateException for bad type in Met…
stu-elastic File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should Metadata be able to read/write it's own XContent stream? Or maybe Metadata should have something to return a Map of its keys to values? I'm considering the case where in the future Metadata may not necessarily be backed by a Map so it won't have something like keySet and get naturally available.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting thoughts but I don't think having Metadata own it's XContent makes sense right now.