Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checkstyle shadows vars pt10 #81361

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Dec 7, 2021

Conversation

pugnascotia
Copy link
Contributor

Part of #19752. Fix more instances where local variable names were
shadowing field names.

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team label Dec 6, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-delivery (Team:Delivery)

Copy link
Contributor

@mark-vieira mark-vieira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pugnascotia pugnascotia merged commit 3e1fb1f into elastic:master Dec 7, 2021
pugnascotia added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
Part of #19752. Fix more instances where local variable names were
shadowing field names.
@pugnascotia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Backported to 8.0 in 5b138d5.

pugnascotia added a commit to pugnascotia/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
Backport of elastic#81361.

Part of elastic#19752. Fix more instances where local variable names were
shadowing field names.
elasticsearchmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2021
Backport of #81361.

Part of #19752. Fix more instances where local variable names were
shadowing field names.
@pugnascotia pugnascotia deleted the checkstyle-shadows-vars-pt10 branch December 21, 2021 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Delivery/Tooling Developer tooliing and automation >refactoring Team:Delivery Meta label for Delivery team v7.16.1 v8.0.0-rc1 v8.1.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants