Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[7.x] Fix LifecycleLicenseIT failures (#66039) #66045

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020

Conversation

andreidan
Copy link
Contributor

This attempts to fix the flakiness in the LifecycleLicenseIT tests.
This waits for an active license to be available in the cluster (REST layer
comes up before) and adds busy waiting for setting/checking the licenses
with logging of responses.

(cherry picked from commit d1ac92a)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan [email protected]

Backport of #66039

This attempts to fix the flakiness in the LifecycleLicenseIT tests.
This waits for an active license to be available in the cluster (REST layer
comes up before) and adds busy waiting for setting/checking the licenses
with logging of responses.

Co-authored-by: Elastic Machine <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit d1ac92a)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <[email protected]>
@andreidan andreidan added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management backport labels Dec 8, 2020
@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team label Dec 8, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (Team:Core/Features)

@andreidan andreidan merged commit 0f1552d into elastic:7.x Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants