-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure authz role for API key is named after owner role #59041
Merged
albertzaharovits
merged 13 commits into
elastic:master
from
albertzaharovits:audit_owner_role_names_for_api_key_authn
Jul 7, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2d5bb1e
WIP
albertzaharovits a2b3655
WIP
albertzaharovits a867338
WIP
albertzaharovits 6f3df69
Done
albertzaharovits 1435148
Checkstyle
albertzaharovits 58e325d
Merge branch 'master' into audit_owner_role_names_for_api_key_authn
albertzaharovits b21a797
Bug
albertzaharovits 103609e
Review
albertzaharovits 7fb790f
Merge branch 'master' into audit_owner_role_names_for_api_key_authn
albertzaharovits ff712c9
Checkstyle
albertzaharovits 9738963
Allowed actions matcher test
albertzaharovits 0f2c6bf
Merge branch 'master' into audit_owner_role_names_for_api_key_authn
albertzaharovits 5f44dec
Merge branch 'master' into audit_owner_role_names_for_api_key_authn
elasticmachine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -346,10 +346,9 @@ private void authenticateAsync() { | |
private void checkForApiKey() { | ||
apiKeyService.authenticateWithApiKeyIfPresent(threadContext, ActionListener.wrap(authResult -> { | ||
if (authResult.isAuthenticated()) { | ||
final User user = authResult.getUser(); | ||
authenticatedBy = new RealmRef(ApiKeyService.API_KEY_REALM_NAME, ApiKeyService.API_KEY_REALM_TYPE, nodeName); | ||
writeAuthToContext(new Authentication(user, authenticatedBy, null, Version.CURRENT, | ||
Authentication.AuthenticationType.API_KEY, authResult.getMetadata())); | ||
final Authentication authentication = apiKeyService.createApiKeyAuthentication(authResult, nodeName); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ++ |
||
this.authenticatedBy = authentication.getAuthenticatedBy(); | ||
writeAuthToContext(authentication); | ||
} else if (authResult.getStatus() == AuthenticationResult.Status.TERMINATE) { | ||
Exception e = (authResult.getException() != null) ? authResult.getException() | ||
: Exceptions.authenticationError(authResult.getMessage()); | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gosh! Is this a bug!?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. At first sight testing for it was not trivial. The bug doesn't seem important though. I'll see what I can do.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've pushed a simple unit test 9738963, it is trivial after all.
The bug is not consequential. It could manifest when resizing and when adding aliases, when using keys with role descriptors, where it fails to allow the operation, although it should.