Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execute retention lease syncs under system context #53838

Conversation

jasontedor
Copy link
Member

The retention lease syncs need to occur under the system context, because they are internal actions executed on behalf of the user. Today we are relying on this happening for background syncs by virtue of the fact that the context the syncs are created under is the system context. This is due to these occurring on the cluster state applier thread. However, there are situations where this does not hold such as when a timed out cluster state publication occurs, and the node where the shard is allocated is the elected master node. In that case, the context will be empty due to the fact that we do not reschedule publication under the system context. Currently, doing so runs us into some troubles with losing the existing context, possibly dropping deprecation headers. We could copy that context over when marking the current context as the system context, but the implications of that require some more investigation. For now, we explicitly mark the retention lease syncs as executing under the system context, as this is situation that we can reason about.

Relates #48430
Relates #53751

The retention lease syncs need to occur under the system context,
because they are internal actions executed on behalf of the user. Today
we are relying on this happening for background syncs by virtue of the
fact that the context the syncs are created under is the system
context. This is due to these occurring on the cluster state applier
thread. However, there are situations where this does not hold such as
when a timed out cluster state publication occurs, and the node where
the shard is allocated is the elected master node. In that case, the
context will be empty due to the fact that we do not reschedule
publication under the system context. Currently, doing so runs us into
some troubles with losing the existing context, possibly dropping
deprecation headers. We could copy that context over when marking the
current context as the system context, but the implications of that
require some more investigation. For now, we explicitly mark the
retention lease syncs as executing under the system context, as this is
situation that we can reason about.
@jasontedor jasontedor added >bug :Distributed Indexing/Distributed A catch all label for anything in the Distributed Area. If you aren't sure, use this one. v8.0.0 v7.7.0 v7.6.2 labels Mar 20, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (:Distributed/Distributed)

Copy link
Contributor

@DaveCTurner DaveCTurner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jasontedor jasontedor merged commit 2794ab7 into elastic:master Mar 20, 2020
jasontedor added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
The retention lease syncs need to occur under the system context,
because they are internal actions executed on behalf of the user. Today
we are relying on this happening for background syncs by virtue of the
fact that the context the syncs are created under is the system
context. This is due to these occurring on the cluster state applier
thread. However, there are situations where this does not hold such as
when a timed out cluster state publication occurs, and the node where
the shard is allocated is the elected master node. In that case, the
context will be empty due to the fact that we do not reschedule
publication under the system context. Currently, doing so runs us into
some troubles with losing the existing context, possibly dropping
deprecation headers. We could copy that context over when marking the
current context as the system context, but the implications of that
require some more investigation. For now, we explicitly mark the
retention lease syncs as executing under the system context, as this is
situation that we can reason about.
jasontedor added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
The retention lease syncs need to occur under the system context,
because they are internal actions executed on behalf of the user. Today
we are relying on this happening for background syncs by virtue of the
fact that the context the syncs are created under is the system
context. This is due to these occurring on the cluster state applier
thread. However, there are situations where this does not hold such as
when a timed out cluster state publication occurs, and the node where
the shard is allocated is the elected master node. In that case, the
context will be empty due to the fact that we do not reschedule
publication under the system context. Currently, doing so runs us into
some troubles with losing the existing context, possibly dropping
deprecation headers. We could copy that context over when marking the
current context as the system context, but the implications of that
require some more investigation. For now, we explicitly mark the
retention lease syncs as executing under the system context, as this is
situation that we can reason about.
@jasontedor jasontedor deleted the execute-background-sync-under-system-context branch March 20, 2020 11:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocker >bug :Distributed Indexing/Distributed A catch all label for anything in the Distributed Area. If you aren't sure, use this one. v7.6.2 v7.7.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants