Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] Correct guidance for index_options mapping parm #52899

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2020
Merged

[DOCS] Correct guidance for index_options mapping parm #52899

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2020

Conversation

jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor

Adds a warning admonition stating that the index_options mapping
parameter is intended only for text fields.

Removes an outdated statement regarding default values for numeric
and other datatypes.

Closes #52777.

Adds a warning admonition stating that the `index_options` mapping
parameter is intended only for `text` fields.

Removes an outdated statement regarding default values for numeric
and other datatypes.
@jrodewig jrodewig added >docs General docs changes :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types labels Feb 27, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/Mapping)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs)

Copy link
Contributor

@mayya-sharipova mayya-sharipova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jrodewig Thanks, the PR makes sense

@jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrodewig commented Mar 2, 2020

Thanks @mayya-sharipova.

@jrodewig jrodewig merged commit 340c08a into elastic:master Mar 2, 2020
@jrodewig jrodewig deleted the patch__index-options branch March 2, 2020 12:37
jrodewig added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2020
Adds a warning admonition stating that the `index_options` mapping
parameter is intended only for `text` fields.

Removes an outdated statement regarding default values for numeric
and other datatypes.
jrodewig added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2020
Adds a warning admonition stating that the `index_options` mapping
parameter is intended only for `text` fields.

Removes an outdated statement regarding default values for numeric
and other datatypes.
@jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor Author

jrodewig commented Mar 2, 2020

Backport commits

master 340c08a
7.x f5bccad
7.6 b8978c3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>docs General docs changes :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types v7.6.2 v7.7.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[DOCS] Default values for index_option mapping parm are inaccurate.
4 participants