Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove type-related methods from QueryBuilders #42284

Merged

Conversation

cbuescher
Copy link
Member

Removes all deprecated type-related methods from the QueryBuilders helper class
and from tests using them. Also removing related docs tests and doc pages
refering to the type query. All removed methods have been deprecated since
version 7.0.

@cbuescher cbuescher added :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types >refactoring v8.0.0 labels May 21, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search

Removes all deprecated type-related methods from the QueryBuilders helper class
and from tests using them. Also removing related docs tests and doc pages
refering to the `type` query. All removed methods have been deprecated since
version 7.0.
@cbuescher cbuescher force-pushed the rm-deprecated-QueryBuilder-typesMethods branch from fb8f26e to 4a70f82 Compare May 21, 2019 12:52
@cbuescher cbuescher merged commit 5fb55f6 into elastic:master May 22, 2019
@cbuescher
Copy link
Member Author

@jpountz thanks for the review

gurkankaymak pushed a commit to gurkankaymak/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 27, 2019
Removes all deprecated type-related methods from the QueryBuilders helper class
and from tests using them. Also removing related docs tests and doc pages
refering to the `type` query. All removed methods have been deprecated since
version 7.0.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>refactoring :Search Foundations/Mapping Index mappings, including merging and defining field types v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants