-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make packer cache branches explicit #41990
Merged
mark-vieira
merged 7 commits into
elastic:master
from
alpar-t:speed-up-packer-cache-script
May 22, 2019
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6abb031
Make packer cache branches explicit
alpar-t 95da02a
Figure out relevant versions
alpar-t 269b238
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into speed-up-packer-cac…
alpar-t e7f2d44
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into speed-up-packer-cac…
alpar-t 71a3a85
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into speed-up-packer-cac…
alpar-t a35f397
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into speed-up-packer-cac…
alpar-t 37208c6
PR review
alpar-t File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem right. A version string without context cannot possibly determine if it is the next major version. This should really live in
BwcVersions
. For exampleVersion.fromString("7.0.0").isNextMajor()
would returntrue
which is obviously incorrect.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The method shouldn't exist probably, and we should just do the check directly.
BWC versions doesn't know about newer versions, e.x on
6.8
there's no way to know how far we'we got. That being said we have usedx.0.0
to identify master, as we will never build ex7.0.0
as soon as it's released we version bump and the branch becomes7.0.1
. This would break down only when we have a major staged (as we had before7.0
was released but the7.x
branch cut). This would I think be acceptable for this use-case (without theisNextMajor
method of course). WDYT @mark-vieira ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd be ok with renaming this something more pedantically accurate like
isNewMajor()
.