Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for PutFollowAction on a closed index #38236

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 4, 2019

Conversation

Tim-Brooks
Copy link
Contributor

This is related to #35975. Currently when an index falls behind a leader
it encounters a fatal exception. This commit adds a test for that
scenario. Additionally, it tests that the user can stop following, close
the follower index, and put follow again. After the indexing is
re-bootstrapped, it will recover the documents it lost in normal
following operations.

This is related to elastic#35975. Currently when an index falls behind a leader
it encounters a fatal exception. This commit adds a test for that
scenario. Additionally, it tests that the user can stop following, close
the follower index, and put follow again. After the indexing is
re-bootstrapped, it will recover the documents it lost in normal
following operations.
@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks added >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v7.0.0 :Distributed Indexing/CCR Issues around the Cross Cluster State Replication features v6.7.0 labels Feb 1, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

Copy link
Member

@jasontedor jasontedor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. Thanks for doing this. In a follow-up, can we also add some documentation for this situation?

Copy link
Member

@martijnvg martijnvg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left one comment, LGTM otherwise.

.filter(Objects::nonNull)
.map(ExceptionsHelper::unwrapCause)
.filter(e -> e instanceof ResourceNotFoundException)
.map(e -> (ResourceNotFoundException) e)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe also exclude exception that do not have es.requested_operations_missing as metadata? Then we are even more sure that the exception is the right one.

Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some nits but LGTM.

for (int i = 0; i < numDocs; i++) {
final String source = String.format(Locale.ROOT, "{\"f\":%d}", i * 2);
leaderClient().prepareIndex("index1", "doc", Integer.toString(i)).setSource(source, XContentType.JSON).get();
leaderClient().admin().indices().flush(new FlushRequest("index1").force(true)).actionGet();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: one flush before the force_merge is good enough :).

assertTrue(response.isFollowIndexShardsAcked());
assertTrue(response.isIndexFollowingStarted());

final Map<ShardId, Long> firstBatchNumDocsPerShard = new HashMap<>();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: maybe use "assertIndexFullyReplicatedToFollower"?

assertTrue(response2.isFollowIndexShardsAcked());
assertTrue(response2.isIndexFollowingStarted());

final Map<ShardId, Long> secondBatchNumDocsPerShard = new HashMap<>();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: maybe use "assertIndexFullyReplicatedToFollower"?

assertThat(exceptions.size(), greaterThan(0));
});

pauseFollow("index2");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what happens if we close before pausing following? What happens if we don't explicitly pause following at all? Let's also check these scenarios.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what happens if we close before pausing following?

It works. We allow closing a follower index. There is a test that checks this behavior testCloseFollowIndex.

Let's also check these scenarios.

I added a test for the failure scenarios in the restart following case (index still open and following not paused).

@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks merged commit 5a33816 into elastic:master Feb 4, 2019
Tim-Brooks added a commit to Tim-Brooks/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2019
This is related to elastic#35975. Currently when an index falls behind a leader
it encounters a fatal exception. This commit adds a test for that
scenario. Additionally, it tests that the user can stop following, close
the follower index, and put follow again. After the indexing is
re-bootstrapped, it will recover the documents it lost in normal
following operations.
Tim-Brooks added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2019
This is related to #35975. Currently when an index falls behind a leader
it encounters a fatal exception. This commit adds a test for that
scenario. Additionally, it tests that the user can stop following, close
the follower index, and put follow again. After the indexing is
re-bootstrapped, it will recover the documents it lost in normal
following operations.
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2019
…-lease-expiration

* elastic/master: (24 commits)
  Add support for API keys to access Elasticsearch (elastic#38291)
  Add typless client side GetIndexRequest calls and response class (elastic#37778)
  Limit token expiry to 1 hour maximum (elastic#38244)
  add docs saying mixed-cluster ILM is not supported (elastic#37954)
  Skip unsupported languages for tests (elastic#38328)
  Deprecate `_type` in simulate pipeline requests (elastic#37949)
  Mute testCannotShrinkLeaderIndex (elastic#38374)
  Tighten mapping syncing in ccr remote restore (elastic#38071)
  Add test for `PutFollowAction` on a closed index (elastic#38236)
  Fix SSLContext pinning to TLSV1.2 in reload tests (elastic#38341)
  Mute RareClusterStateIT.testDelayedMappingPropagationOnReplica (elastic#38357)
  Deprecate types in rollover index API (elastic#38039)
  Types removal - fix FullClusterRestartIT warning expectations (elastic#38310)
  Fix ILM explain response to allow unknown fields (elastic#38054)
  Mute testFollowIndexAndCloseNode (elastic#38360)
  Docs: Drop inline callout from scroll example (elastic#38340)
  Deprecate HLRC security methods (elastic#37883)
  Remove types from Monitoring plugin "backend" code (elastic#37745)
  Add Composite to AggregationBuilders (elastic#38207)
  Clarify slow cluster-state log messages (elastic#38302)
  ...
@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks deleted the test_closed_to_put branch December 18, 2019 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/CCR Issues around the Cross Cluster State Replication features >test Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests v6.7.0 v7.0.0-beta1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants