Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename internal repository actions to be internal #36244

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2018

Conversation

Tim-Brooks
Copy link
Contributor

This is a follow-up to #36086. It renames the internal repository
actions to be prefixed by "internal". This allows the system user to
execute the actions.

Additionally, this PR stops casting Client to NodeClient. The client we
have is a NodeClient so executing the actions will be local.

This is a follow-up to elastic#36086. It renames the internal repository
actions to be prefixed by "internal". This allows the system user to
execute the actions.

Additionally, this PR stops casting Client to NodeClient. The client we
have is a NodeClient so executing the actions will be local.
@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks added >non-issue v7.0.0 :Distributed Indexing/CCR Issues around the Cross Cluster State Replication features v6.6.0 labels Dec 5, 2018
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks merged commit 068c856 into elastic:master Dec 5, 2018
Tim-Brooks added a commit to Tim-Brooks/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2018
This is a follow-up to elastic#36086. It renames the internal repository
actions to be prefixed by "internal". This allows the system user to
execute the actions.

Additionally, this PR stops casting Client to NodeClient. The client we
have is a NodeClient so executing the actions will be local.
@Tim-Brooks Tim-Brooks deleted the internal_repos_action_name branch December 18, 2019 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/CCR Issues around the Cross Cluster State Replication features >non-issue v6.6.0 v7.0.0-beta1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants