Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preserve format when aggregation contains unmapped date fields #35254

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 8, 2018

Conversation

cbuescher
Copy link
Member

Currently when aggregating on an unmapped date field (e.g. when using a
date_histogram) we don't preserve the aggregations format setting but instead
use the default format. This can lead to loosing the aggregations format when
aggregating over several indices where some of them contain unmapped date fields
and are encountered first in the reduce phase.

Related to #31760

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs

Currently when aggregating on an unmapped date field (e.g. using a
date_histogram) we don't preserve the aggregations `format` setting but instead
use the default format. This can lead to loosing the aggregations `format` when
aggregating over several indices where some of them contain unmapped date fields
and are encountered first in the reduce phase.

Related to elastic#31760
@cbuescher
Copy link
Member Author

@elasticmachine test this please

Copy link
Contributor

@jimczi jimczi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch @cbuescher ! LGTM

@cbuescher cbuescher merged commit 14b8114 into elastic:master Nov 8, 2018
cbuescher pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2018
…35254)

Currently when aggregating on an unmapped date field (e.g. using a
date_histogram) we don't preserve the aggregations `format` setting but instead
use the default format. This can lead to loosing the aggregations `format` when
aggregating over several indices where some of them contain unmapped date fields
and are encountered first in the reduce phase.

Related to #31760
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2018
* elastic/master: (25 commits)
  Fixes fast vector highlighter docs per issue 24318. (elastic#34190)
  [ML] Prevent notifications on deletion of a non existent job (elastic#35337)
  [CCR] Auto follow Coordinator fetch cluster state in system context (elastic#35120)
  Mute test for elastic#35361
  Preserve `date_histogram` format when aggregating on unmapped fields (elastic#35254)
  Test: Mute failing SSL test
  Allow unmapped fields in composite aggregations (elastic#35331)
  [RCI] Add IndexShardOperationPermits.asyncBlockOperations(ActionListener<Releasable>) (elastic#34902)
  HLRC: reindex API with wait_for_completion false (elastic#35202)
  Add docs on JNA temp directory not being noexec (elastic#35355)
  [CCR] Adjust list of dynamic index settings that should be replicated (elastic#35195)
  Replicate index settings to followers (elastic#35089)
  Rename RealmConfig.globalSettings() to settings() (elastic#35330)
  [TEST] Cleanup FileUserPasswdStoreTests (elastic#35329)
  Scripting: Add back lookup vars in score script (elastic#34833)
  watcher: Fix integration tests to ensure correct start/stop of Watcher (elastic#35271)
  Remove ALL shard check in CheckShrinkReadyStep (elastic#35346)
  Use soft-deleted docs to resolve strategy for engine operation (elastic#35230)
  [ILM] Check shard and relocation status in AllocationRoutedStep (elastic#35316)
  Ignore date ranges containing 'now' when pre-processing a percolator query (elastic#35160)
  ...
cbuescher pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2018
…35254)

Currently when aggregating on an unmapped date field (e.g. using a
date_histogram) we don't preserve the aggregations `format` setting but instead
use the default format. This can lead to loosing the aggregations `format` when
aggregating over several indices where some of them contain unmapped date fields
and are encountered first in the reduce phase.

Related to #31760
@jimczi jimczi added v7.0.0-beta1 and removed v7.0.0 labels Feb 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants