-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose group_shard_failures
query_string parameter
#32598
Closed
javanna
wants to merge
2
commits into
elastic:master
from
javanna:enhancement/expose_group_shard_failures
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
91 changes: 91 additions & 0 deletions
91
...s/lang-mustache/src/test/resources/rest-api-spec/test/lang_mustache/70_shard_failures.yml
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"shard failures": | ||
- do: | ||
indices.create: | ||
index: text | ||
body: | ||
settings: | ||
number_of_replicas: 0 | ||
number_of_shards: 1 | ||
mappings: | ||
doc: | ||
properties: | ||
creation_date: | ||
type: keyword | ||
|
||
- do: | ||
indices.create: | ||
index: date | ||
body: | ||
settings: | ||
number_of_replicas: 0 | ||
number_of_shards: 3 | ||
mappings: | ||
doc: | ||
properties: | ||
creation_date: | ||
type: date | ||
|
||
- do: | ||
search_template: | ||
body: | ||
source: | ||
query: | ||
match: | ||
creation_date: "{{text_value}}" | ||
params: | ||
text_value: "text" | ||
|
||
- length: { _shards.failures: 1 } | ||
- match: { _shards.failed: 3} | ||
- match: { _shards.total: 4} | ||
- match: { _shards.successful: 1} | ||
|
||
- do: | ||
search_template: | ||
group_shard_failures: false | ||
body: | ||
source: | ||
query: | ||
match: | ||
creation_date: "{{text_value}}" | ||
params: | ||
text_value: "text" | ||
|
||
- length: { _shards.failures: 3 } | ||
- match: { _shards.failed: 3} | ||
- match: { _shards.total: 4} | ||
- match: { _shards.successful: 1} | ||
|
||
- do: | ||
msearch_template: | ||
body: | ||
- index: text,date | ||
- source: | ||
query: | ||
match: | ||
creation_date: "{{text_value}}" | ||
params: | ||
text_value: "text" | ||
|
||
- length: { responses.0._shards.failures: 1 } | ||
- match: { responses.0._shards.failed: 3} | ||
- match: { responses.0._shards.total: 4} | ||
- match: { responses.0._shards.successful: 1} | ||
|
||
- do: | ||
msearch_template: | ||
group_shard_failures: false | ||
body: | ||
- index: text,date | ||
- source: | ||
query: | ||
match: | ||
creation_date: "{{text_value}}" | ||
params: | ||
text_value: "text" | ||
|
||
- length: { responses.0._shards.failures: 3 } | ||
- match: { responses.0._shards.failed: 3} | ||
- match: { responses.0._shards.total: 4} | ||
- match: { responses.0._shards.successful: 1} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with msearch and msearch_template, I had to go with exposing the param only globally. Given how it's read (through
ToXContent.Params
when outputtingSearchResponse
output, it becomes very complicated to support the option per item, and have each response item with its own value read from its own request item.I also wonder if, in general, it is a good idea to expose this new parameter rather than removing support for it, given that it is not documented, we did not realize for a long time that it was not exposed, and we did not get any report about this either.