Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not ignore shard not-available exceptions in replication #28571

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 8, 2018

Conversation

dnhatn
Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn commented Feb 8, 2018

The shard not-available exceptions are currently ignored in the
replication as the best effort avoids failing not-yet-ready shards.
However these exceptions can also happen from fully active shards. If
this is the case, we may have skipped important failures from replicas.
Since #28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This restriction allows us to handle all exceptions in the replication.

There is a side-effect with this change. If a replica retries its peer
recovery second time after being tracked in the replication group, it
can receive replication requests even though it's not-yet-ready. That
shard may be failed and allocated to another node even though it has a
good lucene index on that node.

This PR does not change the way we report replication errors to users,
hence the shard not-available exceptions won't be reported as before.

Relates #28049
Relates #28534

The shard not-available exceptions are currently ignored in the
replication as the best effort avoids failing not-yet-ready shards.
However these exceptions can also happen from fully active shards. If
this is the case, we may have skipped important failures from replicas.
Since elastic#28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This restriction allows us to handle all exceptions in the replication.

There is a side-effect with this change. If a replica retries its peer
recovery second time after being tracked in the replication group, it
can receive replication requests even though it's not-yet-ready. That
shard may be failed and allocated to another node even though it has a
good lucene index on that node.

This PR does not change the way we report replication errors to users,
hence the shard not-available exceptions won't be reported as before.
@dnhatn dnhatn added >enhancement :Distributed Indexing/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. v7.0.0 v6.3.0 labels Feb 8, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@ywelsch ywelsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I think it would be good to only backport to 6.x once this has been running a few days on CI without issues. Also wait on merging this until #28558 is in.

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented Feb 8, 2018

Thanks @ywelsch for your quick review.

@dnhatn dnhatn merged commit dbf9fb3 into elastic:master Feb 8, 2018
@dnhatn dnhatn deleted the replication-exception branch February 8, 2018 23:05
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2018
The shard not-available exceptions are currently ignored in the
replication as the best effort avoids failing not-yet-ready shards.
However these exceptions can also happen from fully active shards. If
this is the case, we may have skipped important failures from replicas.
Since #28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This restriction allows us to handle all exceptions in the replication.

There is a side-effect with this change. If a replica retries its peer
recovery second time after being tracked in the replication group, it
can receive replication requests even though it's not-yet-ready. That
shard may be failed and allocated to another node even though it has a
good lucene index on that node.

This PR does not change the way we report replication errors to users,
hence the shard not-available exceptions won't be reported as before.

Relates #28049
Relates #28534
dnhatn added a commit to dnhatn/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2018
Since elastic#28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This enhancement allows us to handle all exceptions. In elastic#28571, we
started strictly handling shard not-available exceptions and tried to
keep the way we report replication errors to users by only reporting if
the error is not shard-not-available exceptions. However, since then we
unintentionally always log warn for all exception. This change restores
to the previous behavior to log warn only if an exception is not a shard
not-available exception.
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2018
Since #28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This enhancement allows us to handle all exceptions. In #28571, we
started strictly handling shard-not-available exceptions and tried to
keep the way we report replication errors to users by only reporting if
the error is not shard-not-available exceptions. However, since then we
unintentionally always log warn for all exception. This change restores
to the previous behavior which logs warn only if an exception is not a
shard-not-available exception.

Relates #28049
Relates #28571
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2018
Since #28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This enhancement allows us to handle all exceptions. In #28571, we
started strictly handling shard-not-available exceptions and tried to
keep the way we report replication errors to users by only reporting if
the error is not shard-not-available exceptions. However, since then we
unintentionally always log warn for all exception. This change restores
to the previous behavior which logs warn only if an exception is not a
shard-not-available exception.

Relates #28049
Relates #28571
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2018
Since #28049, only fully initialized shards are received write requests.
This enhancement allows us to handle all exceptions. In #28571, we
started strictly handling shard-not-available exceptions and tried to
keep the way we report replication errors to users by only reporting if
the error is not shard-not-available exceptions. However, since then we
unintentionally always log warn for all exception. This change restores
to the previous behavior which logs warn only if an exception is not a
shard-not-available exception.

Relates #28049
Relates #28571
ywelsch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Swallowing these exceptions is dangerous as they can result in replicas going out-of-sync with the primary.

Follow-up to #28571
ywelsch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Swallowing these exceptions is dangerous as they can result in replicas going out-of-sync with the primary.

Follow-up to #28571
ywelsch added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2018
Swallowing these exceptions is dangerous as they can result in replicas going out-of-sync with the primary.

Follow-up to #28571
dnhatn added a commit to dnhatn/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2018
We fail to notify the resync listener if the resync replication hits a
shard unavailable exception. Moreover, we no longer need to swallow
these unavailable exceptions.

Relates elastic#28571
Closes elastic#33613
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2018
We fail to notify the resync listener if the resync replication hits a
shard unavailable exception. Moreover, we no longer need to swallow
these unavailable exceptions.

Relates #28571
Closes #33613
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2018
We fail to notify the resync listener if the resync replication hits a
shard unavailable exception. Moreover, we no longer need to swallow
these unavailable exceptions.

Relates #28571
Closes #33613
dnhatn added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2018
We fail to notify the resync listener if the resync replication hits a
shard unavailable exception. Moreover, we no longer need to swallow
these unavailable exceptions.

Relates #28571
Closes #33613
@colings86 colings86 removed the v7.0.0 label Feb 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Indexing/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. >enhancement v6.3.0 v7.0.0-beta1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants