Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix unnecessary context switch in RankFeaturePhase #113232

Merged

Conversation

original-brownbear
Copy link
Member

If we don't actually execute this phase we shouldn't fork the phase unnecessarily. We can compute the RankFeaturePhaseRankCoordinatorContext on the transport thread and move on to fetch without forking. Fetch itself will then fork and we can run the reduce as part of fetch instead of in a separate search pool task (this is the way it worked up until the recent introduction of RankFeaturePhase, this fixes that regression).

If we don't actually execute this phase we shouldn't fork the phase
unnecessarily. We can compute the RankFeaturePhaseRankCoordinatorContext
on the transport thread and move on to fetch without forking.
Fetch itself will then fork and we can run the reduce as part of fetch instead of in
a separte search pool task (this is the way it worked up until the recent introduction
of RankFeaturePhase, this fixes that regression).
@original-brownbear original-brownbear added >non-issue :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories labels Sep 20, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added Team:Search Meta label for search team v9.0.0 labels Sep 20, 2024
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search (Team:Search)

Copy link
Contributor

@pmpailis pmpailis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Panos!

@original-brownbear original-brownbear merged commit 8a94037 into elastic:main Sep 20, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@original-brownbear original-brownbear deleted the fix-unnecessary-ctx-switch branch September 20, 2024 09:38
@pmpailis
Copy link
Contributor

@original-brownbear should we backport to 8.16 or is this just for 9.0?

@original-brownbear
Copy link
Member Author

Good point, might make sense :) I'll double check with someone :)

@javanna
Copy link
Member

javanna commented Sep 24, 2024

++ I think it would make sense to try to backport to 8.x as much as possible.

original-brownbear added a commit to original-brownbear/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
If we don't actually execute this phase we shouldn't fork the phase
unnecessarily. We can compute the RankFeaturePhaseRankCoordinatorContext
on the transport thread and move on to fetch without forking.
Fetch itself will then fork and we can run the reduce as part of fetch instead of in
a separte search pool task (this is the way it worked up until the recent introduction
of RankFeaturePhase, this fixes that regression).
elasticsearchmachine pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
If we don't actually execute this phase we shouldn't fork the phase
unnecessarily. We can compute the RankFeaturePhaseRankCoordinatorContext
on the transport thread and move on to fetch without forking.
Fetch itself will then fork and we can run the reduce as part of fetch instead of in
a separte search pool task (this is the way it worked up until the recent introduction
of RankFeaturePhase, this fixes that regression).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>non-issue :Search/Search Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories Team:Search Meta label for search team v8.18.0 v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants