-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The first snapshot stuck in inconsistent state after 6.8 -> 7.12 upgrade #75339
Labels
>bug
:Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore
Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs
Team:Distributed (Obsolete)
Meta label for distributed team (obsolete). Replaced by Distributed Indexing/Coordination.
Comments
jtibshirani
added
:Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore
Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs
and removed
needs:triage
Requires assignment of a team area label
labels
Jul 16, 2021
elasticmachine
added
the
Team:Distributed (Obsolete)
Meta label for distributed team (obsolete). Replaced by Distributed Indexing/Coordination.
label
Jul 16, 2021
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (Team:Distributed) |
original-brownbear
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2021
…#75501) This refactors the snapshots-in-progress logic to work from `RepositoryShardId` when working out what parts of the repository are in-use by writes for snapshot concurrency safety. This change does not go all the way yet on this topic and there are a number of possible follow-up further improvements to simplify the logic that I'd work through over time. But for now this allows fixing the remaining known issues that snapshot stress testing surfaced when combined with the fix in #75530. These issues all come from the fact that `ShardId` is not a stable key across multiple snapshots if snapshots are partial. The scenarios that are broken are all roughly this: * snapshot-1 for index-A with uuid-A runs and is partial * index-A is deleted and re-created and now has uuid-B * snapshot-2 for index-A is started and we now have it queued up behind snapshot-1 for the index * snapshot-1 finishes and the logic tries to start the next snapshot for the same shard-id * this fails because the shard-id is not the same, we can't compare index uuids, just index name + shard id * this change fixes all these spots by always taking the round trip via `RepositoryShardId` planned follow-ups here are: * dry up logic across cloning and snapshotting more as both now essentially run the same code in many state-machine steps * serialize snapshots-in-progress efficiently instead of re-computing the index and by-repository-shard-id lookups in the constructor every time * refactor the logic in snapshots-in-progress away from maps keyed by shard-id in almost all spots to this end, just keep an index name to `Index` map to work out what exactly is being snapshotted * refactoring snapshots-in-progress to be a map of list of operations keyed by repository shard id instead of a list of maps as it currently is to make the concurrency simpler and more obviously correct closes #75423 relates (#75339 ... should also fix this, but I have to verify by testing with a backport to 7.x)
original-brownbear
added a commit
to original-brownbear/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2021
…elastic#75501) This refactors the snapshots-in-progress logic to work from `RepositoryShardId` when working out what parts of the repository are in-use by writes for snapshot concurrency safety. This change does not go all the way yet on this topic and there are a number of possible follow-up further improvements to simplify the logic that I'd work through over time. But for now this allows fixing the remaining known issues that snapshot stress testing surfaced when combined with the fix in elastic#75530. These issues all come from the fact that `ShardId` is not a stable key across multiple snapshots if snapshots are partial. The scenarios that are broken are all roughly this: * snapshot-1 for index-A with uuid-A runs and is partial * index-A is deleted and re-created and now has uuid-B * snapshot-2 for index-A is started and we now have it queued up behind snapshot-1 for the index * snapshot-1 finishes and the logic tries to start the next snapshot for the same shard-id * this fails because the shard-id is not the same, we can't compare index uuids, just index name + shard id * this change fixes all these spots by always taking the round trip via `RepositoryShardId` planned follow-ups here are: * dry up logic across cloning and snapshotting more as both now essentially run the same code in many state-machine steps * serialize snapshots-in-progress efficiently instead of re-computing the index and by-repository-shard-id lookups in the constructor every time * refactor the logic in snapshots-in-progress away from maps keyed by shard-id in almost all spots to this end, just keep an index name to `Index` map to work out what exactly is being snapshotted * refactoring snapshots-in-progress to be a map of list of operations keyed by repository shard id instead of a list of maps as it currently is to make the concurrency simpler and more obviously correct closes elastic#75423 relates (elastic#75339 ... should also fix this, but I have to verify by testing with a backport to 7.x)
original-brownbear
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2021
…#75501) (#76539) This refactors the snapshots-in-progress logic to work from `RepositoryShardId` when working out what parts of the repository are in-use by writes for snapshot concurrency safety. This change does not go all the way yet on this topic and there are a number of possible follow-up further improvements to simplify the logic that I'd work through over time. But for now this allows fixing the remaining known issues that snapshot stress testing surfaced when combined with the fix in #75530. These issues all come from the fact that `ShardId` is not a stable key across multiple snapshots if snapshots are partial. The scenarios that are broken are all roughly this: * snapshot-1 for index-A with uuid-A runs and is partial * index-A is deleted and re-created and now has uuid-B * snapshot-2 for index-A is started and we now have it queued up behind snapshot-1 for the index * snapshot-1 finishes and the logic tries to start the next snapshot for the same shard-id * this fails because the shard-id is not the same, we can't compare index uuids, just index name + shard id * this change fixes all these spots by always taking the round trip via `RepositoryShardId` planned follow-ups here are: * dry up logic across cloning and snapshotting more as both now essentially run the same code in many state-machine steps * serialize snapshots-in-progress efficiently instead of re-computing the index and by-repository-shard-id lookups in the constructor every time * refactor the logic in snapshots-in-progress away from maps keyed by shard-id in almost all spots to this end, just keep an index name to `Index` map to work out what exactly is being snapshotted * refactoring snapshots-in-progress to be a map of list of operations keyed by repository shard id instead of a list of maps as it currently is to make the concurrency simpler and more obviously correct closes #75423 relates (#75339 ... should also fix this, but I have to verify by testing with a backport to 7.x)
original-brownbear
added a commit
to original-brownbear/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2021
…elastic#75501) (elastic#76539) This refactors the snapshots-in-progress logic to work from `RepositoryShardId` when working out what parts of the repository are in-use by writes for snapshot concurrency safety. This change does not go all the way yet on this topic and there are a number of possible follow-up further improvements to simplify the logic that I'd work through over time. But for now this allows fixing the remaining known issues that snapshot stress testing surfaced when combined with the fix in elastic#75530. These issues all come from the fact that `ShardId` is not a stable key across multiple snapshots if snapshots are partial. The scenarios that are broken are all roughly this: * snapshot-1 for index-A with uuid-A runs and is partial * index-A is deleted and re-created and now has uuid-B * snapshot-2 for index-A is started and we now have it queued up behind snapshot-1 for the index * snapshot-1 finishes and the logic tries to start the next snapshot for the same shard-id * this fails because the shard-id is not the same, we can't compare index uuids, just index name + shard id * this change fixes all these spots by always taking the round trip via `RepositoryShardId` planned follow-ups here are: * dry up logic across cloning and snapshotting more as both now essentially run the same code in many state-machine steps * serialize snapshots-in-progress efficiently instead of re-computing the index and by-repository-shard-id lookups in the constructor every time * refactor the logic in snapshots-in-progress away from maps keyed by shard-id in almost all spots to this end, just keep an index name to `Index` map to work out what exactly is being snapshotted * refactoring snapshots-in-progress to be a map of list of operations keyed by repository shard id instead of a list of maps as it currently is to make the concurrency simpler and more obviously correct closes elastic#75423 relates (elastic#75339 ... should also fix this, but I have to verify by testing with a backport to 7.x)
original-brownbear
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 16, 2021
…#75501) (#76539) (#76547) This refactors the snapshots-in-progress logic to work from `RepositoryShardId` when working out what parts of the repository are in-use by writes for snapshot concurrency safety. This change does not go all the way yet on this topic and there are a number of possible follow-up further improvements to simplify the logic that I'd work through over time. But for now this allows fixing the remaining known issues that snapshot stress testing surfaced when combined with the fix in #75530. These issues all come from the fact that `ShardId` is not a stable key across multiple snapshots if snapshots are partial. The scenarios that are broken are all roughly this: * snapshot-1 for index-A with uuid-A runs and is partial * index-A is deleted and re-created and now has uuid-B * snapshot-2 for index-A is started and we now have it queued up behind snapshot-1 for the index * snapshot-1 finishes and the logic tries to start the next snapshot for the same shard-id * this fails because the shard-id is not the same, we can't compare index uuids, just index name + shard id * this change fixes all these spots by always taking the round trip via `RepositoryShardId` planned follow-ups here are: * dry up logic across cloning and snapshotting more as both now essentially run the same code in many state-machine steps * serialize snapshots-in-progress efficiently instead of re-computing the index and by-repository-shard-id lookups in the constructor every time * refactor the logic in snapshots-in-progress away from maps keyed by shard-id in almost all spots to this end, just keep an index name to `Index` map to work out what exactly is being snapshotted * refactoring snapshots-in-progress to be a map of list of operations keyed by repository shard id instead of a list of maps as it currently is to make the concurrency simpler and more obviously correct closes #75423 relates (#75339 ... should also fix this, but I have to verify by testing with a backport to 7.x)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>bug
:Distributed Coordination/Snapshot/Restore
Anything directly related to the `_snapshot/*` APIs
Team:Distributed (Obsolete)
Meta label for distributed team (obsolete). Replaced by Distributed Indexing/Coordination.
Elasticsearch version (
bin/elasticsearch --version
):6.8.16
upgraded to7.12
(or7.13
, it looks like minor version doesn't matter here)Plugins installed: [
repository-s3
]Steps to reproduce:
Steps to reproduce for Elastic Cloud:
If we examine
_snapshot
API, we're going to find an oddity:reports
"state": "IN_PROGRESS"
, whereas:reports
"state": "SUCCESS"
Apparently, that snapshot is going to remain in this "inconsistent" state forever. FWIW, this doesn't prevent the snapshot mechanism from being operational - if we delete aforementioned snapshot and capture new one - it's going to work without any issues.
Full API responses:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: