-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wildcard field should return value as Strings not ByteRefs for scripts #58044
Labels
>bug
:Search/Search
Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories
Team:Search
Meta label for search team
Comments
markharwood
added
>bug
:Search/Search
Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories
labels
Jun 12, 2020
Pinging @elastic/es-search (:Search/Search) |
markharwood
added a commit
to markharwood/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2020
This need some reorg of BinaryDV field data classes to allow specialisation of scripted doc values. Moved common logic to a new abstract base class and added a new subclass to return string-based representations to scripts. Closes elastic#58044
markharwood
added a commit
to markharwood/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2020
elastic#58060) This need some reorg of BinaryDV field data classes to allow specialisation of scripted doc values. Moved common logic to a new abstract base class and added a new subclass to return string-based representations to scripts. Closes elastic#58044
Thanks for reporting this, @astefan |
29 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>bug
:Search/Search
Search-related issues that do not fall into other categories
Team:Search
Meta label for search team
To support compatibility with
keyword
fields thewildcard
field should return Strings for values to scripts, not a BytesRef object (currently a ScriptDocValues to be more precise)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: