-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
time_zone parameter in composite aggregation with date_histogram source doesn't work #45199
Labels
Comments
Pinging @elastic/es-analytics-geo |
Is there any news on this? Without |
nik9000
added a commit
to nik9000/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2020
We've been parsing the `time_zone` parameter on `date_hitogram` for a while but it hasn't *done* anything. This wires it up. Closes elastic#45199 Inspired by elastic#45200
nik9000
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2020
nik9000
added a commit
to nik9000/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2020
We've been parsing the `time_zone` parameter on `date_hitogram` for a while but it hasn't *done* anything. This wires it up. Closes elastic#45199 Inspired by elastic#45200
nik9000
added a commit
to nik9000/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2020
We've been parsing the `time_zone` parameter on `date_hitogram` for a while but it hasn't *done* anything. This wires it up. Closes elastic#45199 Inspired by elastic#45200
nik9000
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2020
nik9000
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 11, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Elasticsearch version (
bin/elasticsearch --version
):7.2.0
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
Passing a
time_zone
parameter in a date_histogram source incomposite
aggregation returns wrong buckets.It has been reported in this discussion some months ago, but the problem is still present in master: https://discuss.elastic.co/t/composite-date-aggregation-not-consistent/172666
Steps to reproduce:
The result is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: