-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SQL: Handle nulls for field IN(v1, v2, ..)
expressions
#34582
Labels
Comments
Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs |
matriv
added a commit
to matriv/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2018
Implemented null handling for both the value tested but also for values inside the list of values tested against. The null handling is implemented for local processors, painless scripts and Lucene Terms queries making it available for `IN` expressions occuring in `SELECT`, `WHERE` and `HAVING` clauses. Closes: elastic#34582
matriv
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2018
Implemented null handling for both the value tested but also for values inside the list of values tested against. The null handling is implemented for local processors, painless scripts and Lucene Terms queries making it available for `IN` expressions occuring in `SELECT`, `WHERE` and `HAVING` clauses. Closes: #34582
matriv
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 24, 2018
Implemented null handling for both the value tested but also for values inside the list of values tested against. The null handling is implemented for local processors, painless scripts and Lucene Terms queries making it available for `IN` expressions occuring in `SELECT`, `WHERE` and `HAVING` clauses. Closes: #34582
kcm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2018
Implemented null handling for both the value tested but also for values inside the list of values tested against. The null handling is implemented for local processors, painless scripts and Lucene Terms queries making it available for `IN` expressions occuring in `SELECT`, `WHERE` and `HAVING` clauses. Closes: #34582
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Make sure that null values in the value list and for the field are handled correctly.
Follow up to #32955.
Depends on #34573.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: