Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] SearchIT.testSearchWithSignificantTermsAgg #32855

Closed
andyb-elastic opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

[ci] SearchIT.testSearchWithSignificantTermsAgg #32855

andyb-elastic opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
>test-failure Triaged test failures from CI

Comments

@andyb-elastic
Copy link
Contributor

On 6.x, reproduces locally. Looks like this test was added in #32774

https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+6.x+intake/2257/console

build-2257.txt

REPRODUCE WITH: ./gradlew :client:rest-high-level:integTestRunner -Dtests.seed=4207CF2E79C9815D -Dtests.class=org.elasticsearch.client.SearchIT -Dtests.method="testSearchWithSignificantTermsAgg" -Dtests.security.manager=true -Dtests.locale=pl -Dtests.timezone=Africa/Douala -Dcompiler.java=10 -Druntime.java=8
  1> [2018-08-14T17:59:39,804][INFO ][o.e.c.SearchIT           ] [testSearchWithSignificantTermsAgg] after test
FAILURE 0.76s | SearchIT.testSearchWithSignificantTermsAgg <<< FAILURES!
   > Throwable #1: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<3> but was:<1>
   >    at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([4207CF2E79C9815D:D189593C6CEFC175]:0)
   >    at org.elasticsearch.client.SearchIT.testSearchWithSignificantTermsAgg(SearchIT.java:299)
   >    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Others
https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+6.x+intake/2256/console
https://elasticsearch-ci.elastic.co/job/elastic+elasticsearch+6.x+intake/2255/console

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-infra

markharwood added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2018
…nreliable.

This test is superfluous - it was added to address #32770 but it later turned out there was an existing test that just required a fix to provide the missing test coverage.

Closes #32855
@markharwood
Copy link
Contributor

markharwood commented Aug 15, 2018

Ugh. Sorry for the noise. Removed now redundant test in ecc6dfb but forgot about unused imports which are addressed in 2582b38

Also removed from master via eb812c8

markharwood added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2018
…nreliable.

This test is superfluous - it was added to address #32770 but it later turned out there was an existing test that just required a fix to provide the missing test coverage.

Closes #32855
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
>test-failure Triaged test failures from CI
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants