You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With #19937 it is possible to force the system to allow dots in field names in 2.4. This is difficult to test because it relies on a temporary sysprop that only exists in 2.4. We should add a field with a dot in the name to static bwc indexes created for 2.4+ (and use that sysprop in create_bwc_index.py for any 2.4.x index).
This issue is a reminder to do so after 2.4 is released.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This change adds a `field.with.dots` to all 2.4 bwc indicse and above.
It also adds verification code to OldIndexBackwardsCompatibilityIT to
ensure we upgrade the indices cleanly and the field is present.
Closeselastic#19956
This change adds a `field.with.dots` to all 2.4 bwc indicse and above.
It also adds verification code to OldIndexBackwardsCompatibilityIT to
ensure we upgrade the indices cleanly and the field is present.
Closes#19956
With #19937 it is possible to force the system to allow dots in field names in 2.4. This is difficult to test because it relies on a temporary sysprop that only exists in 2.4. We should add a field with a dot in the name to static bwc indexes created for 2.4+ (and use that sysprop in
create_bwc_index.py
for any 2.4.x index).This issue is a reminder to do so after 2.4 is released.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: