Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
[DOCS] Retrievers and rerankers (#110007) (#111008)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Co-authored-by: Adam Demjen <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
leemthompo and demjened authored Jul 18, 2024
1 parent 41356cd commit 5b9639a
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 261 additions and 38 deletions.
67 changes: 67 additions & 0 deletions docs/reference/search/retriever.asciidoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ A <<knn-retriever, retriever>> that replaces the functionality of a <<search-api
`rrf`::
A <<rrf-retriever, retriever>> that produces top documents from <<rrf, reciprocal rank fusion (RRF)>>.

`text_similarity_reranker`::
A <<text-similarity-reranker-retriever, retriever>> that enhances search results by re-ranking documents based on semantic similarity to a specified inference text, using a machine learning model.

[[standard-retriever]]
==== Standard Retriever

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -201,6 +204,70 @@ GET /index/_search
----
// NOTCONSOLE

[[text-similarity-reranker-retriever]]
==== Text Similarity Re-ranker Retriever

The `text_similarity_reranker` is a type of retriever that enhances search results by re-ranking documents based on semantic similarity to a specified inference text, using a machine learning model.

===== Prerequisites

To use `text_similarity_reranker` you must first set up a `rerank` task using the <<put-inference-api, Create {infer} API>>.
The `rerank` task should be set up with a machine learning model that can compute text similarity.
Currently you can integrate directly with the Cohere Rerank endpoint using the <<infer-service-cohere,`cohere-rerank`>> task, or upload a model to {es} <<inference-example-eland,using Eland>>.

===== Parameters

`field`::
(Required, `string`)
+
The document field to be used for text similarity comparisons. This field should contain the text that will be evaluated against the `inferenceText`.

`inference_id`::
(Required, `string`)
+
Unique identifier of the inference endpoint created using the {infer} API.

`inference_text`::
(Required, `string`)
+
The text snippet used as the basis for similarity comparison.

`rank_window_size`::
(Optional, `int`)
+
The number of top documents to consider in the re-ranking process. Defaults to `10`.

`min_score`::
(Optional, `float`)
+
Sets a minimum threshold score for including documents in the re-ranked results. Documents with similarity scores below this threshold will be excluded. Note that score calculations vary depending on the model used.

===== Restrictions

A text similarity re-ranker retriever is a compound retriever. Child retrievers may not use elements that are restricted by having a compound retriever as part of the retriever tree.

===== Example

[source,js]
----
GET /index/_search
{
"retriever": {
"text_similarity_reranker": {
"retriever": {
"standard": { ... }
}
},
"field": "text",
"inference_id": "my-cohere-rerank-model",
"inference_text": "Most famous landmark in Paris",
"rank_window_size": 100,
"min_score": 0.5
}
}
----
// NOTCONSOLE

==== Using `from` and `size` with a retriever tree

The <<search-from-param, `from`>> and <<search-size-param, `size`>>
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
[[retrievers-reranking-overview]]
== Retrievers and reranking

* <<retrievers-overview>>
* <<semantic-reranking>>

include::retrievers-overview.asciidoc[]
include::semantic-reranking.asciidoc[]
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
[[retrievers-overview]]
== Retrievers

// Will move to a top level "Retrievers and reranking" section once reranking is live
=== Retrievers

preview::[]

Expand All @@ -15,33 +13,32 @@ For implementation details, including notable restrictions, check out the

[discrete]
[[retrievers-overview-types]]
=== Retriever types
==== Retriever types

Retrievers come in various types, each tailored for different search operations.
The following retrievers are currently available:

* <<standard-retriever,*Standard Retriever*>>.
Returns top documents from a traditional https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/query-dsl.html[query].
Mimics a traditional query but in the context of a retriever framework.
This ensures backward compatibility as existing `_search` requests remain supported.
That way you can transition to the new abstraction at your own pace without mixing syntaxes.
* <<knn-retriever,*kNN Retriever*>>.
Returns top documents from a <<search-api-knn,knn search>>, in the context of a retriever framework.
* <<rrf-retriever,*RRF Retriever*>>.
Combines and ranks multiple first-stage retrievers using the reciprocal rank fusion (RRF) algorithm.
Allows you to combine multiple result sets with different relevance indicators into a single result set.
An RRF retriever is a *compound retriever*, where its `filter` element is propagated to its sub retrievers.
* <<standard-retriever,*Standard Retriever*>>. Returns top documents from a
traditional https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/query-dsl.html[query].
Mimics a traditional query but in the context of a retriever framework. This
ensures backward compatibility as existing `_search` requests remain supported.
That way you can transition to the new abstraction at your own pace without
mixing syntaxes.
* <<knn-retriever,*kNN Retriever*>>. Returns top documents from a <<search-api-knn,knn search>>,
in the context of a retriever framework.
* <<rrf-retriever,*RRF Retriever*>>. Combines and ranks multiple first-stage retrievers using
the reciprocal rank fusion (RRF) algorithm. Allows you to combine multiple result sets
with different relevance indicators into a single result set.
An RRF retriever is a *compound retriever*, where its `filter` element is
propagated to its sub retrievers.
+
Sub retrievers may not use elements that are restricted by having a compound retriever as part of the retriever tree.
See the <<rrf-using-multiple-standard-retrievers,RRF documentation>> for detailed examples and information on how to use the RRF retriever.

[NOTE]
====
Stay tuned for more retriever types in future releases!
====
* <<text-similarity-reranker-retriever,*Text Similarity Re-ranker Retriever*>>. Used for <<semantic-reranking,semantic reranking>>.
Requires first creating a `rerank` task using the <<put-inference-api,{es} Inference API>>.

[discrete]
=== What makes retrievers useful?
==== What makes retrievers useful?

Here's an overview of what makes retrievers useful and how they differ from regular queries.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -73,7 +70,7 @@ When using compound retrievers, only the query element is allowed, which enforce

[discrete]
[[retrievers-overview-example]]
=== Example
==== Example

The following example demonstrates how using retrievers simplify the composability of queries for RRF ranking.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -154,33 +151,33 @@ GET example-index/_search

[discrete]
[[retrievers-overview-glossary]]
=== Glossary
==== Glossary

Here are some important terms:

* *Retrieval Pipeline*.
Defines the entire retrieval and ranking logic to produce top hits.
* *Retriever Tree*.
A hierarchical structure that defines how retrievers interact.
* *First-stage Retriever*.
Returns an initial set of candidate documents.
* *Compound Retriever*.
Builds on one or more retrievers, enhancing document retrieval and ranking logic.
* *Combiners*.
Compound retrievers that merge top hits from multiple sub-retrievers.
//* NOT YET *Rerankers*. Special compound retrievers that reorder hits and may adjust the number of hits, with distinctions between first-stage and second-stage rerankers.
* *Retrieval Pipeline*. Defines the entire retrieval and ranking logic to
produce top hits.
* *Retriever Tree*. A hierarchical structure that defines how retrievers interact.
* *First-stage Retriever*. Returns an initial set of candidate documents.
* *Compound Retriever*. Builds on one or more retrievers,
enhancing document retrieval and ranking logic.
* *Combiners*. Compound retrievers that merge top hits
from multiple sub-retrievers.
* *Rerankers*. Special compound retrievers that reorder hits and may adjust the number of hits, with distinctions between first-stage and second-stage rerankers.

[discrete]
[[retrievers-overview-play-in-search]]
=== Retrievers in action
==== Retrievers in action

The Search Playground builds Elasticsearch queries using the retriever abstraction.
It automatically detects the fields and types in your index and builds a retriever tree based on your selections.

You can use the Playground to experiment with different retriever configurations and see how they affect search results.

Refer to the {kibana-ref}/playground.html[Playground documentation] for more information.
// Content coming in https://github.com/elastic/kibana/pull/182692


[discrete]
[[retrievers-overview-api-reference]]
==== API reference

For implementation details, including notable restrictions, check out the <<retriever,reference documentation>> in the Search API docs.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
[[semantic-reranking]]
=== Semantic reranking

preview::[]

[TIP]
====
This overview focuses more on the high-level concepts and use cases for semantic reranking. For full implementation details on how to set up and use semantic reranking in {es}, see the <<retriever,reference documentation>> in the Search API docs.
====

Rerankers improve the relevance of results from earlier-stage retrieval mechanisms.
_Semantic_ rerankers use machine learning models to reorder search results based on their semantic similarity to a query.

First-stage retrievers and rankers must be very fast and efficient because they process either the entire corpus, or all matching documents.
In a multi-stage pipeline, you can progressively use more computationally intensive ranking functions and techniques, as they will operate on smaller result sets at each step.
This helps avoid query latency degradation and keeps costs manageable.

Semantic reranking requires relatively large and complex machine learning models and operates in real-time in response to queries.
This technique makes sense on a small _top-k_ result set, as one the of the final steps in a pipeline.
This is a powerful technique for improving search relevance that works equally well with keyword, semantic, or hybrid retrieval algorithms.

The next sections provide more details on the benefits, use cases, and model types used for semantic reranking.
The final sections include a practical, high-level overview of how to implement <<semantic-reranking-in-es,semantic reranking in {es}>> and links to the full reference documentation.

[discrete]
[[semantic-reranking-use-cases]]
==== Use cases

Semantic reranking enables a variety of use cases:

* *Lexical (BM25) retrieval results reranking*
** Out-of-the-box semantic search by adding a simple API call to any lexical/BM25 retrieval pipeline.
** Adds semantic search capabilities on top of existing indices without reindexing, perfect for quick improvements.
** Ideal for environments with complex existing indices.

* *Semantic retrieval results reranking*
** Improves results from semantic retrievers using ELSER sparse vector embeddings or dense vector embeddings by using more powerful models.
** Adds a refinement layer on top of hybrid retrieval with <<rrf, reciprocal rank fusion (RRF)>>.

* *General applications*
** Supports automatic and transparent chunking, eliminating the need for pre-chunking at index time.
** Provides explicit control over document relevance in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) uses cases or other scenarios involving language model (LLM) inputs.

Now that we've outlined the value of semantic reranking, we'll explore the specific models that power this process and how they differ.

[discrete]
[[semantic-reranking-models]]
==== Cross-encoder and bi-encoder models

At a high level, two model types are used for semantic reranking: cross-encoders and bi-encoders.

NOTE: In this version, {es} *only supports cross-encoders* for semantic reranking.

* A *cross-encoder model* can be thought of as a more powerful, all-in-one solution, because it generates query-aware document representations.
It takes the query and document texts as a single, concatenated input.
* A *bi-encoder model* takes as input either document or query text.
Documents and query embeddings are computed separately, so they aren't aware of each other.
** To compute a ranking score, an external operation is required. This typically involves computing dot-product or cosine similarity between the query and document embeddings.

In brief, cross-encoders provide high accuracy but are more resource-intensive.
Bi-encoders are faster and more cost-effective but less precise.

In future versions, {es} will also support bi-encoders.
If you're interested in a more detailed analysis of the practical differences between cross-encoders and bi-encoders, untoggle the next section.

.Comparisons between cross-encoder and bi-encoder
[%collapsible]
==============
The following is a non-exhaustive list of considerations when choosing between cross-encoders and bi-encoders for semantic reranking:
* Because a cross-encoder model simultaneously processes both query and document texts, it can better infer their relevance, making it more effective as a reranker than a bi-encoder.
* Cross-encoder models are generally larger and more computationally intensive, resulting in higher latencies and increased computational costs.
* There are significantly fewer open-source cross-encoders, while bi-encoders offer a wide variety of sizes, languages, and other trade-offs.
* The effectiveness of cross-encoders can also improve the relevance of semantic retrievers.
For example, their ability to take word order into account can improve on dense or sparse embedding retrieval.
* When trained in tandem with specific retrievers (like lexical/BM25), cross-encoders can “correct” typical errors made by those retrievers.
* Cross-encoders output scores that are consistent across queries.
This enables you to maintain high relevance in result sets, by setting a minimum score threshold for all queries.
For example, this is important when using results in a RAG workflow or if you're otherwise feeding results to LLMs.
Note that similarity scores from bi-encoders/embedding similarities are _query-dependent_, meaning you cannot set universal cut-offs.
* Bi-encoders rerank using embeddings. You can improve your reranking latency by creating embeddings at ingest-time. These embeddings can be stored for reranking without being indexed for retrieval, reducing your memory footprint.
==============

[discrete]
[[semantic-reranking-in-es]]
==== Semantic reranking in {es}

In {es}, semantic rerankers are implemented using the {es} <<inference-apis,Inference API>> and a <<retriever,retriever>>.

To use semantic reranking in {es}, you need to:

. Choose a reranking model. In addition to cross-encoder models running on {es} inference nodes, we also expose external models and services via the Inference API to semantic rerankers.
** This includes cross-encoder models running in https://huggingface.co/inference-endpoints[HuggingFace Inference Endpoints] and the https://cohere.com/rerank[Cohere Rerank API].
. Create a `rerank` task using the <<put-inference-api,{es} Inference API>>.
The Inference API creates an inference endpoint and configures your chosen machine learning model to perform the reranking task.
. Define a `text_similarity_reranker` retriever in your search request.
The retriever syntax makes it simple to configure both the retrieval and reranking of search results in a single API call.

.*Example search request* with semantic reranker
[%collapsible]
==============
The following example shows a search request that uses a semantic reranker to reorder the top-k documents based on their semantic similarity to the query.
[source,console]
----
POST _search
{
"retriever": {
"text_similarity_reranker": {
"retriever": {
"standard": {
"query": {
"match": {
"text": "How often does the moon hide the sun?"
}
}
}
},
"field": "text",
"inference_id": "my-cohere-rerank-model",
"inference_text": "How often does the moon hide the sun?",
"rank_window_size": 100,
"min_score": 0.5
}
}
}
----
// TEST[skip:TBD]
==============

[discrete]
[[semantic-reranking-types]]
==== Supported reranking types

The following `text_similarity_reranker` model configuration options are available.

*Text similarity with cross-encoder*

This solution uses a hosted or 3rd party inference service which relies on a cross-encoder model.
The model receives the text fields from the _top-K_ documents, as well as the search query, and calculates scores directly, which are then used to rerank the documents.

Used with the Cohere inference service rolled out in 8.13, turn on semantic reranking that works out of the box.
Check out our https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-labs/blob/main/notebooks/integrations/cohere/cohere-elasticsearch.ipynb[Python notebook] for using Cohere with {es}.

[discrete]
[[semantic-reranking-learn-more]]
==== Learn more

* Read the <<retriever,retriever reference documentation>> for syntax and implementation details
* Learn more about the <<retrievers-overview,retrievers>> abstraction
* Learn more about the Elastic <<inference-apis,Inference APIs>>
* Check out our https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-labs/blob/main/notebooks/integrations/cohere/cohere-elasticsearch.ipynb[Python notebook] for using Cohere with {es}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ results directly in the Kibana Search UI.
include::search-api.asciidoc[]
include::knn-search.asciidoc[]
include::semantic-search.asciidoc[]
include::retrievers-overview.asciidoc[]
include::retrievers-reranking/index.asciidoc[]
include::learning-to-rank.asciidoc[]
include::search-across-clusters.asciidoc[]
include::search-with-synonyms.asciidoc[]
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5b9639a

Please sign in to comment.