Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Return of net461 #3831

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 21, 2019
Merged

Return of net461 #3831

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 21, 2019

Conversation

Mpdreamz
Copy link
Member

  • Reintroduced HttpWebRequestConnection, this makes the sync paths on full framework not
    rely on GetAwaiter() which is no good in environments with synchronization context (asp.net on full framework)

  • reintroduced net461 as TFM
    also better for packaging, net461 relies on auto-magically including a whole bunch of system packages which is annoying to end users

  • tests now run net461 tests on windows

  • net461 support through multi targeting pack
    meaning you can build develop on the net461 targets from linux/osx as well

Copy link
Contributor

@russcam russcam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a comment about dependencies

build/Elasticsearch.Net.nuspec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- Reintroduced HttpWebRequestConnection, this makes the sync paths on full framework not
  rely on GetAwaiter() which is no good in environments with synchronization context (asp.net on full framework)

- reintroduced net461 as TFM
  also better for packaging, net461 relies on automagically including a whole bunch of system packages which is annoying to end users

- tests now run net461 tests on windows

- net461 support through multi targeting pack
  meaning you can build develop on the net461 targets from linux/osx as well
@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz merged commit 0468fc0 into 7.x Jun 21, 2019
@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz deleted the feature/7.x/net-tfm branch June 21, 2019 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants