Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add response fields to Kibana module based on ECS #7205

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2018

Conversation

ruflin
Copy link
Contributor

@ruflin ruflin commented May 30, 2018

This is based on the ECS http fields: https://github.com/elastic/ecs#http

@ruflin ruflin added in progress Pull request is currently in progress. module Filebeat Filebeat labels May 30, 2018
@ruflin ruflin force-pushed the enhance-kibana-module branch from 86b46b3 to 850f35a Compare June 6, 2018 07:53
HTTP response status_code.
example: 404

- name: http.response.time
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not happy with the naming of this field as it's more the duration of the request and does not directly belong to the response?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any suggestions?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the term "response time" is pretty ubiquitous so wouldn't change it. IIUC this field contains the elapsed time between request received to responses sent by the Kibana server. So if anything you could work in "elapsed" to the name to emphasize that this is a duration rather that a date (e.g. http.response.elapsed_time).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the suggestion, changed to elapsed_time

@ruflin ruflin added the review label Jun 15, 2018
@ruflin ruflin force-pushed the enhance-kibana-module branch from 850f35a to 18961a5 Compare June 15, 2018 08:30
@ruflin ruflin removed the in progress Pull request is currently in progress. label Jun 15, 2018
@ruflin ruflin force-pushed the enhance-kibana-module branch 2 times, most recently from 973c3b1 to 8232b72 Compare June 20, 2018 15:17
@ruflin ruflin force-pushed the enhance-kibana-module branch 2 times, most recently from dbdb26f to a0d409b Compare June 27, 2018 14:35
@ruflin ruflin force-pushed the enhance-kibana-module branch from a0d409b to 0c04499 Compare July 5, 2018 08:25
@ruflin ruflin force-pushed the enhance-kibana-module branch from 0c04499 to faf16a5 Compare July 5, 2018 09:15
@jsoriano jsoriano merged commit d0c8917 into elastic:master Jul 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants