Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.15](backport #40270) x-pack/filebeat/input/cel: avoid a negative request rate #40344

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 24, 2024

This is the minimal change necessary to fix the following problem.

Around the time of a rate limit reset, if current time is after the reset time returned in response headers, the rate limiting code will set a negative target rate, and if that's done at a time when no request budget has accumulated, it will not recover and will wait forever.

Proposed commit message

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

Disruptive User Impact

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs


This is an automatic backport of pull request #40270 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

This is the minimal change necessary to fix the following problem.

Around the time of a rate limit reset, if current time is after the
reset time returned in response headers, the rate limiting code will
set a negative target rate, and if that's done at a time when no
request budget has accumulated, it will not recover and will wait
forever.

(cherry picked from commit de8c76d)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2024 20:54
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Jul 24, 2024
@mergify mergify bot assigned efd6 Jul 24, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Jul 24, 2024
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Jul 24, 2024

This pull request doesn't have a Team:<team> label.

@efd6 efd6 merged commit 355746b into 8.15 Jul 25, 2024
16 of 19 checks passed
@efd6 efd6 deleted the mergify/bp/8.15/pr-40270 branch July 25, 2024 02:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants