Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding dropwizard module #4022

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 20, 2017
Merged

Adding dropwizard module #4022

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 20, 2017

Conversation

vjsamuel
Copy link
Contributor

Adding metricbeat module that can query HTTP servlets that expose dropwizard metrics.

cc: @Randgalt

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Jenkins standing by to test this. If you aren't a maintainer, you can ignore this comment. Someone with commit access, please review this and clear it for Jenkins to run.

1 similar comment
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Jenkins standing by to test this. If you aren't a maintainer, you can ignore this comment. Someone with commit access, please review this and clear it for Jenkins to run.

// Part of new is also setting up the configuration by processing additional
// configuration entries if needed.
func New(base mb.BaseMetricSet) (mb.MetricSet, error) {
logp.Warn("BETA: The dropwizard collector metricset is beta")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have logp.Beta for this

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@exekias
Copy link
Contributor

exekias commented Apr 17, 2017

LGTM apart from a minor comment, please also add a changelog

@vjsamuel vjsamuel force-pushed the dropwizard_module branch 3 times, most recently from d2b21d7 to 0ed0527 Compare April 18, 2017 04:21
@vjsamuel vjsamuel force-pushed the dropwizard_module branch from 0ed0527 to af0eca7 Compare April 18, 2017 04:46
@vjsamuel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ruflin @exekias done with review comments and added integration test.

Copy link
Member

@ruflin ruflin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general LGTM. Left a few minor comments. For the dropwizard integration tests docker image: For me this is not only for automated testing but also having an easy way in case things don't work, for us to manually test with an actual dropwizard app to reproduce potential problems.

[[metricbeat-module-dropwizard]]
== dropwizard Module

This is the dropwizard Module.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a link to dropwizard here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

"net/http"
)

var response = `{"version":"4.0.0","gauges":{"my_gauge{this=that}":{"value":565}},"counters":{"my_counter":{"count":565},"my_counter2{this=that}":{"count":565}},"histograms":{"my_hist":{"count":565,"max":564,"mean":563.3148706761577,"min":0,"p50":564.0,"p75":564.0,"p95":564.0,"p98":564.0,"p99":564.0,"p999":564.0,"stddev":1.0747916190718627}},"meters":{"my_meter":{"count":0,"m1_rate":0.0,"m5_rate":0.0,"m15_rate":0.0,"mean_rate":0.0,"units":"events/second"}},"timers":{"my_timer{this=that}":{"count":0,"max":0.0,"mean":0.0,"min":0.0,"p50":0.0,"p75":0.0,"p95":0.0,"p98":0.0,"p99":0.0,"p999":0.0,"stddev":0.0,"m1_rate":0.0,"m5_rate":0.0,"m15_rate":0.0,"mean_rate":0.0,"duration_units":"seconds","rate_units":"calls/second"}}}`
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For testing the JSON output we don't need the integration tests. We could also do this with eventMapping and just load the content.

I would like to have a docker environment with a real dropwizard app inside (if possible). So in case things break, we have an instance around to test and don't have to build one ourself.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added a proper dropwizard http endpoint as part of the integration run.

"version": "6.0.0-alpha1"
},
"dropwizard": {
"test": {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As it is a "dynamic" metricset I'm a bit undecided what we should do here. In other dynamic metricsets we leave it empty here (https://github.com/elastic/beats/blob/master/metricbeat/module/windows/perfmon/_meta/data.json) but provide an example output in the docs.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed the custom metrics

dw := map[string]interface{}{}

d := json.NewDecoder(strings.NewReader(string(body)))
d.UseNumber()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting. Is there something special about the floats returned so we need this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vjsamuel vjsamuel force-pushed the dropwizard_module branch 3 times, most recently from 203b080 to 87ca8cb Compare April 19, 2017 08:40
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ _meta/beat.full.yml
/metricbeat.test
/docs/html_docs

target/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I assume that is coming from java?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Just as a precaution in case someone tries to build the src locally.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Just as a precaution in case someone tries to build the src locally.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't that directory be inside the test folder?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. As long as there is no other directory named target we shouldn't have any issues.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case I would suggest to create a .gitignore file inside the dropwizard module.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

@vjsamuel vjsamuel force-pushed the dropwizard_module branch from 87ca8cb to e25c068 Compare April 19, 2017 18:26
@vjsamuel vjsamuel force-pushed the dropwizard_module branch from e25c068 to 85ba381 Compare April 19, 2017 19:00
@andrewkroh
Copy link
Member

jenkins, test it

@ruflin ruflin merged commit f3f189c into elastic:master Apr 20, 2017
@ruflin
Copy link
Member

ruflin commented Apr 20, 2017

@vjsamuel Thanks a lot for the contribution.

@vjsamuel vjsamuel deleted the dropwizard_module branch May 2, 2017 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants