Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

action: checks for x-pack/dockerlogbeat #32751

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 1, 2022

Conversation

v1v
Copy link
Member

@v1v v1v commented Aug 22, 2022

What does this PR do?

Use GitHub actions to run the check stage for x-pack/dockerlogbeat

What's the check stage?

  • mage check
  • mage update

Why is it important?

Faster builds by running linting/checks outside of the main CI Pipeline.

Errors

Further details

The existing checks in Jenkins are replaced with GitHub checks, hence the union of these 2 new Github workflows substitutes each former check. Therefore, the same commands will run for the same scenarios.

Results

Nearly 10 minutes since they build was triggered in Jenkins and still waiting for workers to be assigned, while the new GitHub checks finished relatively much faster

Related issues

Similar to #32711

@v1v v1v self-assigned this Aug 22, 2022
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label label Aug 22, 2022
@v1v v1v added automation Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team backport-7.17 Automated backport to the 7.17 branch with mergify backport-v8.4.0 Automated backport with mergify and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Aug 22, 2022
@v1v v1v requested a review from a team August 22, 2022 16:34
@v1v v1v marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2022 16:34
@v1v v1v requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2022 16:34
@v1v v1v requested review from fearful-symmetry and leehinman and removed request for a team August 22, 2022 16:34
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Aug 22, 2022

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2022-08-30T16:26:53.032+0000

  • Duration: 27 min 18 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 6
Skipped 0
Total 6

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 24, 2022

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b feature/check-actions-dockerlogbeat-modules upstream/feature/check-actions-dockerlogbeat-modules
git merge upstream/main
git push upstream feature/check-actions-dockerlogbeat-modules

@v1v v1v requested a review from cmacknz September 1, 2022 10:13
@v1v v1v merged commit 80bacd4 into elastic:main Sep 1, 2022
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 80bacd4)

# Conflicts:
#	x-pack/dockerlogbeat/Jenkinsfile.yml
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2022
v1v added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 80bacd4)

Co-authored-by: Victor Martinez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automation backport-7.17 Automated backport to the 7.17 branch with mergify backport-v8.4.0 Automated backport with mergify Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants