Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-pick #23686 to 7.x: Fixed reenroll scenario #23689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2021

Conversation

michalpristas
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-pick of PR #23686 to 7.x branch. Original message:

What does this PR do?

Continuation of #23569 on enroll we need to cleanup state otherwise when agent starts it will report unenrolled and fails to proceed with configuration check.

Why is it important?

Reenroll scenario when agent is unenrolled and enrolled later at the time

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in CHANGELOG.next.asciidoc or CHANGELOG-developer.next.asciidoc.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/agent (Team:Agent)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/ingest-management (Team:Ingest Management)

@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Jan 26, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Build Cause: Pull request #23689 opened

    • Start Time: 2021-01-26T14:07:24.709+0000
  • Duration: 20 min 1 sec

  • Commit: 8a487a0

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 1448
Skipped 6
Total 1454

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

Expand to view the summary

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 1448
Skipped 6
Total 1454

Copy link
Contributor

@EricDavisX EricDavisX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm; can we run tests?

@michalpristas michalpristas merged commit da94576 into elastic:7.x Jan 26, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants