Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-pick #10225 to 6.x: [Auditbeat] System module: Update and re-enable package dataset #10399

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cwurm
Copy link
Contributor

@cwurm cwurm commented Jan 29, 2019

Cherry-pick of PR #10225 to 6.x branch. Original message:

Re-enables the disabled package dataset and brings it up to date with the other, soon-to-be released datasets.

High-level changes:

  • Renamed to package (singular)
  • Scheduled state reporting based on state.period and package.state.period
  • Common fields: event.kind, event.action, event.id, message
  • Save/Restore package information to disk

Unfortunately, the changes to package.go are extensive enough that the Github diff view presents it as a new file. A lot of lines have indeed changed, though none of the concepts are net new, they either exist in the other datasets or in the disabled implementation of the dataset.

Follow-ups, already listed in #10103:

  • Improve Homebrew package collection: parse INSTALL_RECEIPT.json
  • RPM support (Add RPM packaging #9092)
  • Dashboard
  • More and better tests

…tic#10225)

Re-enables the disabled `package` dataset and brings it up to date with the other, soon-to-be released datasets.

High-level changes:

- Renamed to `package` (singular)
- Scheduled state reporting based on `state.period` and `package.state.period`
- Common fields: `event.kind`, `event.action`, `event.id`, `message`
- Save/Restore package information to disk

(cherry picked from commit 1e2c30a)
@cwurm cwurm closed this Jan 29, 2019
@cwurm cwurm deleted the backport_10225_6.x branch January 29, 2019 14:47
@cwurm cwurm restored the backport_10225_6.x branch January 29, 2019 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant