Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade webrick from 1.4.2 to 1.8.2 #26

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ekmixon
Copy link
Owner

@ekmixon ekmixon commented Sep 24, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the rubygems dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Gemfile
⚠️ Warning
Failed to update the Gemfile.lock, please update manually before merging.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity HTTP Request Smuggling
SNYK-RUBY-WEBRICK-8068535
  658  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-WEBRICK-8068535
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot ('[Snyk]' found in title). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants