You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
MIABIS aims to standardize data elements used to describe biobanks, research on samples, and associated data.
It defines, general attributes to describe biobanks and sample collections at an aggregated/metadata level.
The model of EJPRD can represent the biobank Resource to be compliant with the MIABIS concepts and attributes.
The current EJPRD model uses a customized term from the EJPRD vocabulary for a Biobank Resource (ejprd:Biobank). To be compliant with MIABIS I propose to adopt obib ontology to denote the concepts.
The list of changes I propose to make the model compliant with MIABIS, is the following:
Replace the ejp:Biobank entity to be a dcat:Resource (so it fits in the DCAT model) and obo:OBIB_0000616 (obib:biobank). The term from OBIB will make the concept to be compatible with MIABIS collection.
Change dct:publisher object of the Biobank (i.e. the current :organisationShape) with the following changes:
add type obo:OBIB_0000623 (obib:biobank_organization) to specify it is a Biobank Organization as defined by MIABIS. It will be both a foaf:Organization and an obib:biobank_organization
add the obo:OBIB_0000732 (obib:owns) that relates the biobank to the obib:biobank. This may not be strictly necessary (there is already the dct:publisher ) but it better defines the nature of the link between the biobank organization and its collections as defined by MIABIS.
add the obo:RO_0000053 (obo:has_charasteristic) predicate to specify the Legal Entity of the Organization. This field, which may be optional, is used to model the "Juristic Person" attribute of a Biobank Organization in MIABIS. Since there is no specific property for this, I propose a generic predicate that links to an object of type obo:OMRSE_00000038 (obo:legal_entity).
MIABIS aims to standardize data elements used to describe biobanks, research on samples, and associated data.
It defines, general attributes to describe biobanks and sample collections at an aggregated/metadata level.
The model of EJPRD can represent the biobank Resource to be compliant with the MIABIS concepts and attributes.
The current EJPRD model uses a customized term from the EJPRD vocabulary for a Biobank Resource (
ejprd:Biobank
). To be compliant with MIABIS I propose to adopt obib ontology to denote the concepts.The list of changes I propose to make the model compliant with MIABIS, is the following:
ejp:Biobank
entity to be adcat:Resource
(so it fits in the DCAT model) andobo:OBIB_0000616
(obib:biobank). The term from OBIB will make the concept to be compatible with MIABIS collection.:organisationShape
) with the following changes:obo:OBIB_0000623
(obib:biobank_organization) to specify it is a Biobank Organization as defined by MIABIS. It will be both afoaf:Organization
and anobib:biobank_organization
obo:OBIB_0000732
(obib:owns) that relates the biobank to theobib:biobank
. This may not be strictly necessary (there is already thedct:publisher
) but it better defines the nature of the link between the biobank organization and its collections as defined by MIABIS.obo:RO_0000053
(obo:has_charasteristic) predicate to specify the Legal Entity of the Organization. This field, which may be optional, is used to model the "Juristic Person" attribute of a Biobank Organization in MIABIS. Since there is no specific property for this, I propose a generic predicate that links to an object of typeobo:OMRSE_00000038
(obo:legal_entity).The changes can be seen in the PR #39
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: