HCMPRE FIX #1648
HCMPRE FIX #1648
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanWithCensus.js (1)
Line range hint
43-49: Enhance error handling with specific error types and logging.The current error handling could be more robust and informative for debugging purposes.
} catch (error) { + // Log error for debugging + console.error("searchPlanWithCensus failed:", error); + if (error?.response?.data?.Errors) { - throw new Error(error.response.data.Errors[0].message); + const apiError = error.response.data.Errors[0]; + throw new Error(`API Error: ${apiError.code} - ${apiError.message}`); + } else if (error instanceof Error) { + throw error; } - throw new Error("An unknown error occurred"); + throw new Error("An unknown error occurred while searching plans"); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanWithCensus.js (1 hunks)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PlanInbox.js (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanWithCensus.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: checkhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PlanInbox.js (1)
Pattern
**/*.js: check
🔇 Additional comments (5)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanWithCensus.js (1)
Line range hint
1-42: Add type safety and response validation.The function could benefit from better type safety and response validation:
Consider adding:
- TypeScript type definitions for API responses
- Runtime validation for critical properties:
// Add at the start of the function const validatePlanResponse = (response) => { if (!Array.isArray(response?.Plan)) { throw new Error("Invalid plan data received"); } return response; }; const validateCensusResponse = (response) => { if (!Array.isArray(response?.Census)) { throw new Error("Invalid census data received"); } return response; };This would make the code more maintainable and catch potential API contract changes early.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PlanInbox.js (4)
86-87: LGTM! Proper implementation of server-side pagination parametersThe API integration correctly uses the limit and offset parameters from state for server-side pagination.
413-415: LGTM! Proper DataTable pagination configurationThe DataTable component is correctly configured with pagination props using the appropriate state variables and reasonable page size options.
212-213:⚠️ Potential issueRemove duplicate setState call
There's a duplicate call to
setActiveFilterwith the same value.setTotalRows(planWithCensus?.TotalCount) setActiveFilter(planWithCensus?.StatusCount); - setActiveFilter(planWithCensus?.StatusCount);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint
31-415: Verify pagination implementation across the codebaseLet's verify that the pagination implementation is consistent with other similar components in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the pagination implementation.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final verification response about the pagination implementation.
Pagination implementation is consistent with codebase patterns
The pagination implementation in PlanInbox.js follows the established patterns found across the codebase:
State management is consistent with other components:
- Uses same state variables (
currentPage,rowsPerPage,totalRows)- Similar initialization values (currentPage: 1, rowsPerPage: 5)
- Consistent
limitAndOffsetpattern found in PopInbox.js and other componentsPage change handlers follow the standard pattern:
handlePageChangeupdates currentPage and calculates offsethandlePerRowsChangeupdates both page size and offset- Consistent with implementations in PopInbox.js and other components
API integration:
- Properly uses limit/offset in API criteria
- Consistent with other paginated API calls in the codebase
The implementation aligns well with the established patterns across the microplan module and other modules in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar DataTable implementations with pagination # to ensure consistency across the codebase # Search for DataTable components with pagination echo "Searching for other DataTable implementations with pagination..." rg -l 'DataTable.*pagination.*paginationServer' --type js # Search for similar pagination state management echo "Searching for similar pagination state management..." rg 'const.*\[.*Page.*setState.*\].*useState' --type js # Search for similar limit/offset implementations echo "Searching for similar limit/offset patterns..." rg 'limit.*offset.*criteria' --type jsLength of output: 514
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for DataTable components with pagination using broader patterns echo "Searching for DataTable components with pagination..." rg -A 5 '<DataTable.*pagination' --type js # Search for pagination-related state management echo "Searching for pagination state hooks..." rg -A 3 '\[.*currentPage.*useState\(' --type js # Search for handlePageChange implementations echo "Searching for page change handlers..." rg -A 5 'handlePageChange.*=' --type js # Search for limit and offset in API calls echo "Searching for limit/offset in API parameters..." rg -A 3 'limit:.*offset:' --type jsLength of output: 17332
...web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/hooks/services/searchPlanWithCensus.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...h/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PlanInbox.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...h/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/PlanInbox.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
nipunarora-eGov
dismissed
coderabbitai[bot]’s stale review
unable to merge even after resolving
Choose the appropriate template for your PR:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
TotalCountproperty to the response from the plan search, enhancing data visibility.Bug Fixes
Improvements