Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open microplan screen #1549
Open microplan screen #1549
Changes from 7 commits
b13d2e8
5514f4e
3960f34
d821c79
f8e914c
e638256
47a8abb
c00835f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve constant naming and structure for consistency
The new
OTHERS
constant could be improved for better clarity and consistency:OTHERS
is not descriptive. Consider a more specific name likeADDITIONAL_ROLES
.ROLES
constant.To address these issues and incorporate the suggestion from a previous review, consider merging this into the
ROLES
object:This approach centralizes role definitions and maintains consistency.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove or modify the redundant
generateOtherLink
functionThe
generateOtherLink
function is nearly identical togenerateLink
, introducing unnecessary code duplication. Additionally, it usesROLES.OTHERS
, which is incorrect. Consider the following options:If no differentiation is needed, remove
generateOtherLink
and usegenerateLink
for all links.If different behavior is intended for "other" links, update the function accordingly:
This approach aligns with the suggested changes to the
ROLES
constant and provides a clear distinction between different types of links.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent link generation in the
links
arrayThe "MY_MICROPLANS" link is added using
generateOtherLink
, which is inconsistent with other links. To maintain consistency and reduce potential issues, update this section to use a single link generation function:If different role requirements are needed for "MY_MICROPLANS", ensure that the link generation function (whether
generateLink
or a modified version) can handle different role sets appropriately.