Boundary screen1

[abishekTa-egov]

Back button onClick for setup changed

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced role item rendering in the user interface.
  • Improved navigation logic in the employee setup process.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated validation to allow empty mobile numbers.

• Improvements

  • Added robust handling for role selection and logging enhancements.
  • Adjusted data handling for role filtering and customization settings.
  • Improved processing of role configurations for better user experience.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve modifications to the UICustomizations object in UICustomizations.js, including updates to function logic and imports. Key updates include allowing empty mobile numbers, enhancing handling of the roleschosen variable, setting a hardcoded tenant ID, and altering the rendering of role items. These adjustments reflect improvements in data handling and rendering within the affected components.

Changes

File	Change Summary
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js	- Adjusted imports for Link, useLocation, useHistory, and useParams. - Updated customValidationCheck to allow empty mobile numbers. - Enhanced preProcess to default roleschosen to an empty object. - Set hardcoded tenant ID in rolesForFilter. - Modified additionalCustomizations for improved rendering of role items.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SetupMicroplan.js	- No alterations made.

Possibly related PRs

• User management screen #1496: Changes in UserManagementConfig and UserManagement components relate to user management functionalities.
• Boundary screen1 #1522: This PR also involves modifications to the UICustomizations.js file, specifically affecting the UserManagementConfig, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding user management configurations.

🐇 In the code, we hop and play,
With changes brightening the way.
Mobile numbers now can be bare,
Navigation flows with thoughtful care.
Debugging tools help us see,
A smoother path for you and me! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 5

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9a0851 and f365034.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (4 hunks)
• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SetupMicroplan.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (2)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SetupMicroplan.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🪛 Biome

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js

[error] 105-105: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.

Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement

(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)

---

[error] 154-154: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

---

[error] 155-155: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.

Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.

(lint/performance/noDelete)

---

[error] 206-206: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.

Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement

(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SetupMicroplan.js (1)

215-215: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

LGTM! Consider adding a clarifying comment.

The change from currentStep === 0 to currentKey === 1 aligns well with the component's use of currentKey for managing the form's progress. This modification ensures consistency in the navigation logic.

Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of currentKey === 1, such as:

// currentKey === 1 represents the initial step of the form
if (currentKey === 1) {
  history.push(`/${window.contextPath}/employee`);
}

To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect the navigation flow, please verify:

1. The user can still navigate back to the employee page from the first step of the form.
2. The navigation behaves correctly for all other steps.

You can use the following script to check for any other occurrences of currentStep === 0 that might need similar updates:

✅ Verification successful

Verified!
The change from currentStep === 0 to currentKey === 1 in SetupMicroplan.js is appropriate and does not affect other parts of the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of 'currentStep === 0' in JavaScript files
rg --type js 'currentStep\s*===\s*0'

Length of output: 2156

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the definitions and assignments of 'currentStep' in JavaScript files
rg --type js '(let|const|var)\s+currentStep\s*=|(this\.currentStep|state\.currentStep)\s*='

Length of output: 93

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ast-grep to find usages and definitions of 'currentStep' in JavaScript files
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'currentStep: $_' .
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'function $_(.*, currentStep, $_)' .
ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const $_ = $_.currentStep' .

Length of output: 548

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all instances of 'currentStep' in JavaScript and JSX files, including as props and within JSX
rg --type js 'currentStep' 
rg --type jsx 'currentStep'

Length of output: 13744

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all instances of 'currentStep' in JavaScript and JSX files, including as props and within JSX
rg 'currentStep' --glob '*.js' --glob '*.jsx'

Length of output: 13707

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (1)

112-112: ⚠️ Potential issue

Correct the comment to match the return value

The comment states Return true for empty input, but the code returns false. Please update the comment to accurately reflect the return value.

Apply this diff to correct the comment:

- return false; // Return true for empty input
+ return false; // Return false for empty input

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f365034 and 5ed540c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (4 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🪛 Biome

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js

[error] 1-1: Declarations inside of a import declaration may not have duplicates

a second declaration of Link is not allowed

Link is first declared here

(parse)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (2)

106-111: Confirm if allowing empty mobile numbers is intentional

In the customValidationCheck function, the code now allows empty mobile numbers by returning false when the phone is empty. Please verify if this change aligns with the application's validation requirements. If mobile numbers are meant to be mandatory, this alteration might lead to unintended behavior.

---

Line range hint 150-151:

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome

[error] 1-1: Declarations inside of a import declaration may not have duplicates

a second declaration of Link is not allowed

Link is first declared here

(parse)

updated