fix: add startMode types #182
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@fengmk2 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new optional Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant App as MockApplication
participant Config as MockClusterOptions
Config->>App: Configure startMode
alt startMode = 'process'
App->>App: Initialize in process mode
else startMode = 'worker_threads'
App->>App: Initialize in worker threads mode
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/lib/types.ts (1)
60-60: Consider adding a doc comment forstartMode.Adding a short JSDoc/TypeDoc comment could clarify when to use
'process'vs'worker_threads'and any potential system requirements for the latter.test/cluster.test.ts (1)
39-47: Good addition of theworker_threadstest suite.These lines effectively demonstrate how to initialize the cluster in worker threads mode. However, if you aim to support earlier Node.js versions that lack
worker_threads, consider conditionally skipping these tests or documenting that those versions aren’t supported.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/lib/types.ts(1 hunks)test/cluster.test.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/cluster.test.ts (2)
53-58: Verify whether app.process is expected to remain valid in worker_threads mode.
In worker threads mode, app.process might not consistently match the main process context. Confirm that referencing app.process is still correct and doesn't conflict with the underlying worker thread environment.
60-62: Test name is sufficiently descriptive.
This test confirms the application logs the correct port in worker threads mode, thereby ensuring the feature works as expected. Good coverage here.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #182 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 57.34% 57.35% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 21 21
Lines 2438 2439 +1
Branches 191 191
==========================================
+ Hits 1398 1399 +1
Misses 1040 1040 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
[skip ci] ## [6.0.4](v6.0.3...v6.0.4) (2025-01-01) ### Bug Fixes * add startMode types ([#182](#182)) ([c9b8aca](c9b8aca))
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
startModeconfiguration for mock cluster setups, supporting'process'and'worker_threads'initialization modesTests
worker_threadsstart mode scenarios