-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding ConsumptionSaving to the docs #469
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we have just HARK.ConsumptionSaving on the home page instead of all the models?
If there's a natural way to do that, yes, it would be better to just have
HARK.ConsumptionSaving there -- IF the contents of each of the models will
get indexed by Sphinx?
Eventually we would want to do the same with, say, HARK.FirmInvestment when
we have that set of models fleshed out.
…On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 7:33 AM Mridul Seth ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
Should we have just HARK.ConsumptionSaving on the home page instead of all
the models?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#469?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAKCK73EBECKDCBK6QRFP33Q4XBY5A5CNFSM4KEBIKS2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOCRAXIGI#pullrequestreview-339833881>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKCK74NE3WFFZ2BRKFBBL3Q4XBY5ANCNFSM4KEBIKSQ>
.
--
- Chris Carroll
|
I'm not sure how to do this cleanly. |
Maybe we can do it like QuantEcon does it? |
…mptionSaving reorg...
I've played around with this some. The It looks like most other projects use a more hands-on approach to configuring their documentation. What about splitting up the docs into 'Tools' and 'Models'? In the current PR, no individual classes are listed on the documentation home page. |
As of the most recent commit:
Requesting review. |
This new commit gets things to how we discussed in the last meeting:
Requesting review from @MridulS |
You can see how this works on my fork's RTD's now: |
It looks like there's something wrong with the status checks after the recent merge from master. The GitHub actions tests have all passed. |
all good now, Travis just needed a little bit of nudge to rebuild it. |
look ok to merge? |
+1 |
This PR addresses #468