You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the default unemployment process is included as a variation of the transitory shock process.
An alternative way of representing unemployment may be more transparent and flexible, allowing for alternative performance optimizations. @llorracc notes this.
It would be worth trying an alternative implementation and benchmarking it, see #982
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't see how transitory unemployment shocks can be anything other than transitory income values. We don't want them to exist as a separate variable in simulation, as that forces the user to use a specification with "unemployment", but we're trying to remove those restrictions.
Currently the default unemployment process is included as a variation of the transitory shock process.
An alternative way of representing unemployment may be more transparent and flexible, allowing for alternative performance optimizations. @llorracc notes this.
It would be worth trying an alternative implementation and benchmarking it, see #982
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: