Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

removing DEMARKs that are now in HARK/examples, fixes #81 #107

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sbenthall
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@llorracc
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbenthall odd, the checks failed -- I don't see why removing anything should cause checks to fail ...

@sbenthall
Copy link
Contributor Author

The failing tests are due to this PR in HARK
econ-ark/HARK#527 (comment)

I'll submit a different PR to peg the dependency to 0.10.4

@sbenthall
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, I can put that change into this PR

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ python:
# command to install dependencies
install:
- pip install -r requirements.txt
- pip install git+https://github.com/econ-ark/HARK.git@master
- pip install git+https://github.com/econ-ark/HARK.git@0.10.4
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I’m not sure about this. Users will find this weird as DemARKs won’t be running with the latest HARK.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I see. You have people using the binder/requirements.txt file in the install instructions.

I was confused because econ-ark is not in the requirements.txt file at the top level.

@sbenthall
Copy link
Contributor Author

With the latest commit, those following the installation instructions will have working DemARKs.

I am working on changes that will fix the DemARKs broken in this PR: econ-ark/HARK#527

But those changes are unrelated to this PR, which is about something else.

@sbenthall
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok I'm going to add these removals to the PR for #109

@sbenthall sbenthall closed this Mar 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants