docs: Restructured adoption view #699 #812
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- expanded contens - added notice section
bcronin90
reviewed
Oct 9, 2023
bcronin90
reviewed
Oct 9, 2023
stephanbcbauer
added
the
documentation
|
@jkbquabeck Are we just waiting for the architecture picture? Or is something else missing? thx |
Once my comments are addressed, I mean to approve. Though, that doesn't mean much, considering I'm no Contributor. |
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
|
Since the contents of the adoption view moved to the github.io repo, do we still need to merge it here? |
|
This pull request is stale because it has been open for 7 days with no activity. |
|
This pull request was closed because it has been inactive for 7 days since being marked as stale. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WHAT
This PR brings in a restuctured Adoption View for the Connector KIT and is linked to issue #699.
Contents were restructured, terminology section moved from Development View into Adoption View and notice section was added.
WHY
The old adoption view was not structured enough and differed from other KITs.