Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: provide a multi-tenancy sample #691

Merged

Conversation

ndr-brt
Copy link
Contributor

@ndr-brt ndr-brt commented Aug 4, 2023

WHAT

Provide a multi-tenancy sample and related documentation.

WHY

Requested by #659

FURTHER NOTES

  • created a samples folder that didn't existed, I'm not sure it was the best choice, feedback welcome.

Closes #659

@ndr-brt ndr-brt force-pushed the 659-multi-tenancy branch 2 times, most recently from b33e99b to 5fd7f37 Compare August 4, 2023 13:14
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 7, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Contributor

@paullatzelsperger paullatzelsperger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would elaborate on why anyone would want to do this, e.g. saving resources, easy debuggability, and in what scenarios, e.g. having many light-weight instances for small customers, etc.

@paullatzelsperger paullatzelsperger merged commit 7e53b65 into eclipse-tractusx:main Aug 7, 2023
23 checks passed
@ndr-brt ndr-brt deleted the 659-multi-tenancy branch August 7, 2023 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

EDC - Revise Multi-Tenancy PR (ext: CXAR-1033)
3 participants