DCM-KIT for Release 24.08

[ClosedSourcerer]

Description

This PR contains the DCM-Kit for release 24.08.
Only the DCM-KIT (and links to the DCM KIT) are affected by this PR

Figure: Changed Files

The following issues are addressed.

eclipse-tractusx/sig-release#587
eclipse-tractusx/sig-release#585
eclipse-tractusx/sig-release#608

https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/14
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/21
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/12
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/7
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/10

Some highlites:

• Added missing license information (TRG.7.08)
• Introduced Swagger API documentation
• Introduced Q&A
• Refined On-Boarding
• Restructured Kit
• Added sections for Standard Add Ons

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

• DEPENDENCIES are up-to-date. Dash license tool. Committers can open IP issues for restricted libs.
• Copyright and license header are present on all affected files

[jschu1]

Thumps up @ClosedSourcerer

[nhaenis]

LGTM - nice work @ClosedSourcerer!

[nhaenis]

Updated links from https://catena-x.net/de/standard-library to https://catenax-ev.github.io/docs/next/standards/CX-0128-DemandandCapacityManagementDataExchange see #955

[ClosedSourcerer]

@evegufy

https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/docs/release/trg-7/trg-7-00/#keep-the-following-updated-for-each-pull-request-to-the-default-branch-main

This is technically no CodeContribution, but just KIT as Documentation. Hence I assume that the 1000 line rule does not apply here.

[AngelikaWittek]

@ClosedSourcerer

This is technically no CodeContribution, but just KIT as Documentation. Hence I assume that the 1000 line rule does not apply here.

The rule applies, please see: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-project-content
"The content contains more than 1,000 lines of content (including documentation, code, configuration files, and other forms of source code)."

[carslen]

ECA Check failed: https://api.eclipse.org/git/eca/status/gh/eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io/969

ECA is mandatory for Eclipse-Tractusx contributions.

[carslen]

The following issues are addressed.

[...]

https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/14
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/21
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/12
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/7
https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-ex-dcm/issues/10

To work open and transparent we shall not use/link to closed eco-systems in PRs in TractusX. I'm Committer of TractusX and unable to view these Issues thus I won't approve this PR.

[carslen]

Regarding ECA:

That is my local account. After a GIT update i needed to reset my config, hence one or two commits were using my local account.

This might help: https://gist.github.com/trey/9588090

[danielmiehle]

Just to sum it up:

• Please resolve the ECA conflicts. Fix e-mails in commit history / squash commits if necessary
• To ensure high-quality reviews, we would ask you to divide the PR into (reasonably) smaller PRs. This is good practice for both code and documentation reviews as described above.
• Please execute the IP check by the Eclipse Foundation for this PR.
• For the R24.08 KIT reviews, please add @jSchuetz88, as well as @maximilianong and me as reviewing committers (in addition to your business reviewers).
• For future KIT reviews, you will need dedicated reviewing committers for your KIT. @jSchuetz88 @stephanbcbauer: Can you please add this information in the upcoming townhall meetings.

Thank you for your support and for adapting the open topics!

[ClosedSourcerer]

There will be new PRs.