chore(products/repositories): adapt/update whole list of products/repositories #968
Conversation
stephanbcbauer
added
documentation
|
Ok, I have updated our Digital Product Pass product description and configurations. I also removed the eco pass kit repo, since it is not really a product and it is archived. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If this list was generated by a script or similar, it should maybe be re-run without taking archived repos into account.
I already suggested in the past, that if this list is maintained here, we should maybe automate it with the same logic as the TRG dashboard is generated: https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/sig-release/
This dashboard already groups repos to products and also ignores archived repos. SIGs and supporting repos are also already separated.
Maybe both approaches (website + dashboard) can be combined, so that there is no duplication and manual effort.
@almadigabor and @tomaszbarwicki: Could you two please double check this PR explicitly? You are referenced in a lot of product, where I guess you did TRG checks or merged contributions. I guess you are not actually involved in all of the products
Hey @SebastianBezold, I had a look at the products where I'm listed as committer and added comments where I see fit. |
stephanbcbauer
requested review from
almadigabor,
SujitMBRDI,
tom-rm-meyer-ISST,
mhellmeier and
SebastianBezold
This reverts commit b6facf9.
|
sldt topics LGTM |
@tunacicek THX, just to confirm, also this comment? The SLDT Topic was the only open Part. So if it is OK for you, I would be happy for a approval :) Maybe also from your side @matbmoser |
@stephanbcbauer : Thanks for the feedback. I will take a look. Maybe it make sense as tom mention to separate the products in "semantic-layer & digital twin" and discovery services. |
THX @tunacicek I will wait for feedback? Correct? |
* digital twin registry * semantic layer * discovery services
I separated the products into digital twin registry, semantic layer, and discovery services. |
|
@mhellmeier , @tom-rm-meyer-ISST you requested changes, we already adapted them. Is it OK for you to merge the PR for now? Would like to work on a clean state with beginning of the new year |
stephanbcbauer
dismissed
evegufy’s stale review
we already changed your requests :)
Co-authored-by: Tom Meyer <[email protected]>
stephanbcbauer
dismissed stale reviews from mhellmeier and matbmoser
via
630232a
Thx, normally i add a done, maybe i missed it somewhere since there were so many changes: |
stephanbcbauer
requested review from
mhellmeier,
matbmoser and
tom-rm-meyer-ISST
|
Thank you, everybody … let's rework the list if needed. |
Description
The main purpose for this PR is to update our product list. It's old and not up to date. The initial idea was to publish all our active products in this list. Since we are always asking about the responsible committer for each repository, I tried to update the list for each repository depending on the committers' contribution to the repository.
What is needed in this PR @eclipse-tractusx/automotive-tractusx-committers, please have a look at your product, repositories or where you are listed as committer. Is this correct? Is there a description or something missing within your product? Should we describe something more in detail? Would be happy about your sugestions.
Goal
If this PR is merged (hopefully we can do this) we would have a list of all products/repositories and the related committer which is responsible for this product/repository.
Pre-review checks
Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review: