Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat: Add confidence criteria to generic business partner model #693

Merged

Conversation

nicoprow
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request adds confidence criteria fields to the generic business partner model.

  • add confidence criteria fields to generic API DTOs
  • added persistence for the confidence criteria in the Gate
  • changed test and test values accordingly
  • made adjustments to the common base DTO interfaces for better integration

Solves #670 after #692 has been merged

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

@nicoprow nicoprow changed the title Feat/confidence criteria generic Feat: Add confidence criteria to generic business partner model Dec 26, 2023
@nicoprow nicoprow force-pushed the feat/confidence-criteria-generic branch 2 times, most recently from ce13c3e to 9fcd165 Compare December 29, 2023 04:48
@nicoprow nicoprow marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2023 04:50
… model

- add confidence criteria fields to generic API DTOs
- added persistence for the confidence criteria in the Gate
- changed test and test values accordingly
- made adjustments to the common base DTO interfaces for better integration
@nicoprow nicoprow force-pushed the feat/confidence-criteria-generic branch from 9fcd165 to 4a09886 Compare December 29, 2023 04:56
@nicoprow nicoprow merged commit 849607b into eclipse-tractusx:main Dec 29, 2023
9 checks passed
@nicoprow nicoprow deleted the feat/confidence-criteria-generic branch December 29, 2023 05:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant