-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace rimraf with shx #404
Conversation
deaaccb
to
e697a65
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
I noticed that generator-sprotty doesn't produce any output, and I don't see why. Could you have a look?
I will |
Fixed: Clean in I have remove package level build, watch and test scripts, too. Is this too radical? Performance wise this is not a problem. The question is if peoplefrom now on will use something else then the top-level ones. My experience from other projects is that I usually don't. But that is only my opinion. 😊 WDYT? We no longer require |
f060e12
to
975fb60
Compare
975fb60
to
651504d
Compare
If we can keep the package-level scripts at no cost, I think we should do that. They may not be used frequently, but it can still be useful to have them. |
Done! |
@kaisalmen @spoenemann |
shx
is the command-line util ofshelljs
which is already a dependency ofyeoman-generator
I just realized
rimraf
was updated again after a long pause. Nowshelljs
is moving slow, but there still seems to be activity.