Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Get branch name from issue #953

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Get branch name from issue #953

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

TruongQuangSB
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Test Results

121 tests  ±0   121 ✅ ±0   13s ⏱️ +2s
 28 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
 28 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit f6bbccc. ± Comparison against base commit 54c79bb.

This pull request removes 9 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both. 
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@3ae2ed38
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@45d64d27
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@7ee3d262
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@396e6d9
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@75308740
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@401926df, expected=multi/container-id/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@3ff8a3ad, expected=multi/456/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@63dc3420, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@38054d01, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/123/other=xxx]

org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@acf859d
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@6a0cbc6f
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@37ce3644
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@4b869331
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@38018b62
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@ab327c, expected=multi/container-id/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@3d798e76, expected=multi/456/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@1109730f, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@1f7336b2, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/123/other=xxx]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
Closed
@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB linked an issue Oct 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
TruongQuangSB-patch-1 - Tables different #954
Closed
@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB changed the title Test Get branch name from issue Oct 11, 2024
mariusheine
mariusheine reviewed Oct 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
.github/workflows/update-table-reference.yml
@@ -47,7 +54,7 @@ jobs:
shell: bash
run: |
ls
python -u -m updatereference --prNumber=${{ github.event.issue.number }}
python -u -m updatereference --issueNumber=${{ github.event.issue.number }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB This looks somehow old. Didn't we renamed the python module to update-table-reference?

I don't find the PR anymore where I requested this 🙈

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mariusheine ah i have revert this change, because it will be same with docker image name

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB Ahh alright 🤣 Then it looked fine

@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB merged commit 3c4a9e7 into main Oct 11, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB deleted the TruongQuangSB-patch-1 branch October 11, 2024 11:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mariusheine mariusheine mariusheine approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TruongQuangSB-patch-1 - Tables different
2 participants
@TruongQuangSB @mariusheine