Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

z/TPF libffi Port #34

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2017
Merged

Conversation

jjohnst-us
Copy link
Contributor

z/TPF libffi updates. Stack size updated to match z/TPF
requirements. Ohter minor runtime updates specific to
z/TPF. Including missing guard macro in getj9bin for
z/TPF, and disabling RTTI.

Signed-off-by: jjohnst-us [email protected]

z/TPF libffi updates.  Stack size updated to match z/TPF
requirements.  Ohter minor runtime updates specific to
z/TPF.  Including missing guard macro in getj9bin for
z/TPF, and disabling RTTI.

Signed-off-by: jjohnst-us <[email protected]>
@dnakamura
Copy link
Contributor

You may need to add your own pre-conf directory for everything to work nicely (basically just the generated files after running ./configure on the libffi directory), unless you can piggyback on the zlinux config successfully.

@genie-openj9
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

2 similar comments
@genie-openj9
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@genie-openj9
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

The commit message doesn't seem to match the changes. In particular I don't see any code for "Stack size updated to match z/TPF requirements."

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

pshipton commented Sep 22, 2017

Ah, the stack size update is in the libffi/ztpf/sysv.S file.

@DanHeidinga
Copy link
Member

Jenkins test sanity

@pshipton pshipton merged commit 8f246df into eclipse-openj9:master Sep 22, 2017
fjeremic pushed a commit to fjeremic/openj9 that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2018
…7-ibm_sdk

Revert "Revert "Add methods inherited from superinterfaces to iTables""
tajila pushed a commit to tajila/openj9 that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2019
* Removed unnecessary members

* Crude implementation of the 1 tag feature

* Fixed rvalue formatting
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants