-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 728
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update getMemberVMInfo behavior to match RI #14044
Conversation
local testing showed assertion failure in actual testcase failures related to FFI should be addressed in #13315 |
- Move invocation type check before vTableIndex check to avoid method vtable index returned for invokespecial call. Signed-off-by: Jack Lu <[email protected]>
fe1ccf2
to
333c5d7
Compare
@fengxue-IS Can you confirm if the assertion is not seen for all the tests listed in #13995? If so, |
With local build
Passed tests:
Failed due to FFI related errors:
Failed due to exception from FFI code:
Crashed:
Per discussion with @ChengJin01 , FFI test failures to be addressed in #13315 |
The FFI related test failures were already addressed in #13315. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. @tajila These changes only impact JDK17+. Can you launch PR builds to verify these changes?
Jenkins test sanity win jdk17 |
Jenkins test sanity,extended zlinux jdk17 |
eclipse-openj9/openj9#13995 has been fixed via eclipse-openj9/openj9#14044. So, the tests excluded for eclipse-openj9/openj9#13995 have been re-enabled. Tests failures documented in the below issues have been excluded: - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14079 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14080 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14084 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14091 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14092 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14093 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14094 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14095 Signed-off-by: Babneet Singh <[email protected]>
eclipse-openj9/openj9#13995 has been fixed via eclipse-openj9/openj9#14044. So, the tests excluded for eclipse-openj9/openj9#13995 have been re-enabled. Test failures documented in the below issues have been excluded: - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14079 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14080 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14084 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14091 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14092 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14093 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14094 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14095 Signed-off-by: Babneet Singh <[email protected]>
eclipse-openj9/openj9#13995 has been fixed via eclipse-openj9/openj9#14044. So, the tests excluded for eclipse-openj9/openj9#13995 have been re-enabled. Test failures documented in the below issues have been excluded: - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14079 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14080 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14084 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14091 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14092 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14093 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14094 - eclipse-openj9/openj9#14095 Signed-off-by: Babneet Singh <[email protected]>
Related: #13946
Close: #13995
Signed-off-by: Jack Lu [email protected]