Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#436] Add to the FAQ how to define a custom type; Add type restricti… #447

Merged

Conversation

elfenpiff
Copy link
Contributor

@elfenpiff elfenpiff commented Oct 7, 2024

…on warnings to all examples that handle with types

Notes for Reviewer

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

  1. Add sensible notes for the reviewer
  2. PR title is short, expressive and meaningful
  3. Relevant issues are linked in the References section
  4. Every source code file has a copyright header with SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR MIT
  5. Branch follows the naming format (iox2-123-introduce-posix-ipc-example)
  6. Commits messages are according to this guideline
  7. Tests follow the best practice for testing
  8. Changelog updated in the unreleased section including API breaking changes
  9. Assign PR to reviewer
  10. All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

  • Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
  • Unit tests have been written for new behavior
  • Public API is documented
  • PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

  1. All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

Relates to #436

… type restriction warnings to all examples that handle with types
@elfenpiff elfenpiff self-assigned this Oct 7, 2024
@elfenpiff elfenpiff requested a review from orecham October 7, 2024 13:03
@elfenpiff elfenpiff merged commit 2649b09 into eclipse-iceoryx:main Oct 7, 2024
19 of 22 checks passed
@elfenpiff elfenpiff deleted the iox2-436-document-type-restrictions branch October 7, 2024 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants