Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make AbstractTool's accessibleStep mechanism accessible for subclasses #426

Closed
lredor opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #427
Closed

Make AbstractTool's accessibleStep mechanism accessible for subclasses #426

lredor opened this issue Apr 17, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #427

Comments

@lredor
Copy link
Contributor

lredor commented Apr 17, 2024

Currently, it's not possible to use the methods "accStepReset()", "accStepIncrement()" and "accGetStep()" in AbstractTool subclasses. The goal of this issue is to make these methods protected to allow its use in a subclass.

The final goal is to use them in a subclass of Sirius for issue 359.

lredor added a commit to lredor/gef-classic that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2024
@azoitl azoitl assigned ptziegler and unassigned ptziegler Apr 17, 2024
lredor added a commit to lredor/gef-classic that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2024
lredor added a commit to lredor/gef-classic that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2024
azoitl pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 24, 2024
lredor added a commit to eclipse-sirius/sirius-desktop that referenced this issue Apr 25, 2024
This commit removes the code duplicated from GEF as it is now available
as API in GEF (through issue
eclipse-gef/gef-classic#426).

Bug: #376
lredor added a commit to eclipse-sirius/sirius-desktop that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2024
This commit removes the code duplicated from GEF as it is now available
as API in GEF (through issue
eclipse-gef/gef-classic#426).

Bug: #376
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants