-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[gompi/2022.05] in-place update to netCDF v4.9.0 #15677
[gompi/2022.05] in-place update to netCDF v4.9.0 #15677
Conversation
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1154235429 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
|
It is not the cause of the build failure we are seeing, but we must add https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/Unidata/netcdf-c/pull/2412.patch in to get the correct library name. |
The:
is no longer needed. Also, this issue is in building the static libs ( |
…ERSION configure option which is no longer needed
I've opened an issue upstream for this: Unidata/netcdf-c#2419 |
I commented with a bit of analysis in the upstream issue, a workaround for us may be to patch |
…e via 'make test'
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1164114153 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegel |
Test report by @boegelbot |
Test report by @branfosj |
Test report by @branfosj |
@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2 |
@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 1164165503 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @branfosj |
Test report by @boegelbot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Going in, thanks @boegel! |
Test report by @boegel |
Test report by @boegel |
I intended to actually open #15676 with netCDF v4.9.0, but apparently I managed to screw that up 😅
(opened as draft PR, because compilation fails even though it worked fine with v4.8.1...)