Renamed ambiguous Ray easyconfigs to Ray-assembler and Ray-project

[Darkless012]

Renamed ambiguous Ray easyconfigs to be distinguishable.
More info in issue #10757

[smoors]

@Darkless012 thanks for doing this.
however, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to modify files in the archive since, to me, an archive is a sort of historical reference.
what do you think?

[Micket]

I don't mind changing the archive so that it matches the name of non-archived configs. We have git history for actual history?

[boegel]

There's little point to change archived easyconfigs, the whole reason we've archived them is because we won't maintain them (and they'll be removed in the next major release of EasyBuild).

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
FAILED
Build succeeded for 1 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node2622.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/77a2ae2ff0f4121a0e38e35da3314898 for a full test report.

[lexming]

@Darkless012 thanks for fixing the name collision. Following the comments of previous reviewers I have removed the change to archived easyconfigs. I hope that you agree with this change.

[lexming]

Test report by @lexming
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node381.hydra.os - Linux centos linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/7aa86578f2a5e0c2a1b8489dabc8357f for a full test report.

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso

PR test command 'EB_PR=11727 EB_ARGS= /apps/slurm/default/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_11727 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 9802

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 735211711 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

lgtm

requested changes done

[boegel]

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
node2720.swalot.os - Linux centos linux 7.8.2003, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/a25e53e8ee730033054cdc35b1d62c38 for a full test report.

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 2 out of 2 (2 easyconfigs in total)
generoso-c1-s-1 - Linux centos linux 8.2.2004, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d232cacc395626458d5271d417080042 for a full test report.